Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession)

[Dr. Maserati]

I misunderstood. I do that more often than I like.

The problem with engaging Armstrong is he is a cunning manipulator. Assistance would be understood by him to be a stage to teach the idiots beneath him that believe forces "railroaded" him. Again, it's who he is. Look at the post above this one. That should be sufficient evidence of his world view.

See, the highlighted is not true. All that yak was part of the myth and the myth was kept alive because he was a bully who would send his goons after you.

Now he is an exposed cheat and liar the goons are toothless and now he is in the anger stage so we see a rather sad and pathetic show.

 

[webvan]

Lance Armstrong ‏@lancearmstrong 1h
Appreciated the opp 2 speak 2 @StephaneMandard from @lemondefr however didn't appreciate the twisting of my words. Sorry for the confusion.

What confusion? Did he get a threatening call from Verdruggen? Haha...that would serve him right!

 

[Oldman]

See, the highlighted is not true. All that yak was part of the myth and the myth was kept alive because he was a bully who would send his goons after you.

Now he is an exposed cheat and liar the goons are toothless and now he is in the anger stage so we see a rather sad and pathetic show.

But this t*rd will keep bobbing to the surface every July and he'll still lay claim to having "won" the Tour. Van Garderen's comments don't help. All of these guys need to know retroactive testing will become the standard.

 

[Bosco10]

See, the highlighted is not true. All that yak was part of the myth and the myth was kept alive because he was a bully who would send his goons after you.

Now he is an exposed cheat and liar the goons are toothless and now he is in the anger stage so we see a rather sad and pathetic show.

Yes, Lance is in the anger stage. It was only a matter of time before he started yaking and yelping. And he really needs to be "relevant" or else his fat ego starves. Twinkies for the ego.. ha.

 

[86TDFWinner]

Personally I don't think u can come even close to winning the tdf without dope, and to me Lance confirmed what I already thought.

You'd be incorrect then. Wonderboy proved only that you can win 7 tours by doping yourself to the gills.

LeMond won 3 times completely clean, so how again has it been proven that you can't win clean? Please explain. LeMond is in a class by himself.


Please post ANY credible proof he(LeMond)doped, as you seem to allude that LeMond somehow didn't win his 3 TDFs clean, as your statement reads. Do you know something we all don't?

 

[86TDFWinner]

When you say "doping" this is a generic term that covers a whole range of performance enhancers. Do you mean specifically "blood doping"? The real game changer drug. Go faster over night without doing anymore training drug

I think that Lemond was clearly anti "blood" doping, so was unlikely to have done this specifically, and it ended his career according to him.

AGAIN(for the 1,000,000th time and the sedan): Please point out ANY credible times/dates/who administered drugs to Greg, etc. I'm sick to f¢^€^£g death of listening to the "well there's a chance LeMond doped" hyperbol that sooooooooo many people want so desperately to be true. But isn't.
Its been Proven time and time and time again that Greg has been clean ALL 3 times he won the tour. I don't understand how much more simpler or clearer that it could be explained so people comprehend & understand it.

If Wonderboy and his band of merry idiots(and upwards of $300k) can't find anything, can we for the LAST f^|π¢€^g time put it to rest already that GREG was clean when he won his 3 TDFs and WCs?

Its an old, sad, broken record that I'm beyond sick of hearing.
I'm talking about ALL drugs.........do you have info that he took something illegal in his career? Please post it here if you do.

 

[JRTinMA]

AGAIN(for the 1,000,000 time and the sedan): Please point out ANY credible times/dates/who administered drugs to Greg, etc. I'm sick to f¢^€ death of listening to the "well there's a chance LeMond doped" hyperbol that people want so desperately to be true. But isn't.

I'm talking about ALL drugs.........do you have info that he took something illegal in his career? Please post it here if you do.

Nice try.

Not sure when facts became the burden of proof in the clinic. Be happy your a LeMond fan and not a Froome fan, your head would explode.

Cocaine, by his own admission.

 

[MacRoadie]

Not sure when facts became the burden of proof in the clinic. Be happy your a LeMond fan and not a Froome fan, your head would explode.

Cocaine, by his own admission.

I believe he meant "all drugs, taken with the specific intent of enhancing cycling performance".

But you probably knew that and just need a button to push on a Friday afternoon...

 

[JRTinMA]

I believe he meant "all drugs, taken with the specific intent of enhancing cycling performance".

But you probably knew that and just need a button to push on a Friday afternoon...

True on the bolded.

My first point stands. No proof needed in here and acting like a righteous **** does not mean LeMond was clean. I'm not sure why anybody would care at this point.

 

[H2OUUP2]

Not sure when facts became the burden of proof in the clinic. Be happy your a LeMond fan and not a Froome fan, your head would explode.

Cocaine, by his own admission.

Cocaine's a hell of a drug.

 

[DirtyWorks]

True on the bolded.

My first point stands. No proof needed in here and acting like a righteous **** does not mean LeMond was clean. I'm not sure why anybody would care at this point.

There is a long Lemond thread that goes in circles about ten times. Post your allegations there. Names, dates, drugs are required. Be specific! I'm very interested and look forward to better information.

Or, you can just pretend like all the others....

Something tells me you will do the latter.

 

[JRTinMA]

There is a long Lemon thread that goes in circles about ten times. Post your allegations there. Names, dates, drugs are required. Be specific! I'm very interested and look forward to better information.

Or, you can just pretend like all the others....

Something tells me you will do the latter.

LOL the LeMond army has been activated.

 

[86TDFWinner]

I believe he meant "all drugs, taken with the specific intent of enhancing cycling performance".

But you probably knew that and just need a button to push on a Friday afternoon...

Thank you.....we have a winner.


I continue asking and people continue disappearing soon after and produce NOTHING.

 

[JRTinMA]

Thank you.....we have a winner.


I continue asking and people continue disappearing soon after and produce NOTHING.

Btw all I did was answer your poorly worded stupid question and ask why the burden of proof was different. I believe LeMond was a clean champion, now get over yourself.

 

[86TDFWinner]

True on the bolded.

My first point stands. No proof needed in here and acting like a righteous **** does not mean LeMond was clean. I'm not sure why anybody would care at this point.

If you don't care, as you supposedly claim, then why did you bother responding if only to troll? For someone who "doesn't care", you sure seem to.

 

[86TDFWinner]

There is a long Lemond thread that goes in circles about ten times. Post your allegations there. Names, dates, drugs are required. Be specific! I'm very interested and look forward to better information.

Or, you can just pretend like all the others....

Something tells me you will do the latter.

One of my fellow posters is spot on yet again and paying attention.

 

[DirtyWorks]

LOL the LeMond army has been activated.

I'm interested in busting another cycling myth. You seem to believe there's another one. If you are so committed to the allegations, then post them. It's that simple. Somehow I think nothing will happen. Again. For the 100th time.

 

[86TDFWinner]

Btw all I did was answer your poorly worded stupid question and ask why the burden of proof was different. I believe LeMond was a clean champion, now get over yourself.

You've answered nothing, except maybe admitting that you're trolling. May I suggest a different cycling board for your trolling to take place....regardless of how "stupid" and "poorly worded" you claim it was, it irked you enough to post a rather weak response, right? But feel free to troll more. There would have to be actual proof for it to be different, right? AGAIN, do you have ANY credible info from ANYONE that LeMond doped, or no?(crickets chirp).

Back up the fail dozer for you sir.

 

[JRTinMA]

I'm interested in busting another cycling myth. You seem to believe there's another one. If you are so committed to the allegations, then post them. It's that simple. Somehow I think nothing will happen. Again. For the 100th time.

I do? You have an active imagination and horrible reading skills.

On another note, YOU have NEVER busted a myth, not even the smallest contribution. You post in a forum, to kill a little time now and then.

 

[JRTinMA]

You've answered nothing, except maybe admitting that you're trolling. May I suggest a different cycling board for your trolling to take place....regardless of how "stupid" and "poorly worded" you claim it was, it irked you enough to post a rather weak response, right? But feel free to troll more. There would have to be actual proof for it to be different, right? AGAIN, do you have ANY credible info from ANYONE that LeMond doped, or no?(crickets chirp).

Back up the fail dozer for you sir.

Troll, you are the only troll here. I know trolls very well, I signed up here to troll fools and had a good time doing it but I retired. You admonished somebody over lack of proof, proof is not required here. So again, I made no claims of doping beyond LeMond's own admissions, if your want to hyper troll have at it junior.

 

[python]

I'm interested in busting another cycling myth. You seem to believe there's another one. If you are so committed to the allegations, then post them. It's that simple. Somehow I think nothing will happen. Again. For the 100th time.

dont kid yourself, dirtyworks, in stead, check the still available hard facts about the long time armstrong fanboy who for years lashed out against his infatuation critics, very consistently ! Including the persons his boy was trying to destroy...

-he called mike anderson on this very forum a drug mule for texas, never apologized publicly , lied and obfuscated when reminded
-attacked betsy several times as being married to a doper just cowardly hurt the her and disappear
-multiple sudden appearances to promote lemond the doper theme despite never contributing anything but the vile, spite and jelosy.

 

[JRTinMA]

dont kid yourself, dirtyworks, in stead, check the still available hard facts about the long time armstrong fanboy who for years lashed out against his infatuation critics, very consistently ! Including the persons his boy was trying to destroy...

-he called mike anderson on this very forum a drug mule for texas, never apologized publicly , lied and obfuscated when reminded
-attacked betsy several times as being married to a doper just to hurt the her
-multiple sudden appearances to promote lemond the doper theme despite never contributing anything but the vile, spite and jelosy.

I figured you would show up. Betsy is married to a doper.

 

[Fearless Greg Lemond]

I noticed today the farmboy from Texas accusing the only American Tour de France winner of doping, but what you guys are on is also interesting, time for a doping control for the Clinic.

 

[86TDFWinner]

I do? You have an active imagination and horrible reading skills.

On another note, YOU have NEVER busted a myth, not even the smallest contribution. You post in a forum, to kill a little time now and then.

If I may: he's forgotten more about cycling than you know. Its obvious you dont know much, or you'd be posting the proof the clinics been interested in reading about for years now. When can we expect your proof on LeMond and when he doped? It has to be CREDIBLE too, not something your goldfishs brothers, step uncle in law told you. Dates/times/ drs/ former teammates who saw him do it during ANY of his 3 tour wins, etc.
So you have NO proof to back up your weak assertion that LeMond doped? What a surprise. Your credibility is now shot afaic. But, we know you "don't care", so we know you won't worry about it. I'm sure you'll continue posting, despite you "not caring", oh goody.

 

[86TDFWinner]

Troll, you are the only troll here. I know trolls very well, I signed up here to troll fools and had a good time doing it but I retired. You admonished somebody over lack of proof, proof is not required here. So again, I made no claims of doping beyond LeMond's own admissions, if your want to hyper troll have at it junior.

ONCE AGAIN, when did LeMond admit he doped? Still waiting.........how about it Hoss?

PS, also explain what a "hyper troll" is, because I have no idea what one is, please.........thanks in advance sharpshooter.