They don’t attack at the bottom of a climb and never look back because they know they rode everyone off their wheel. Teamwork is still essential but you don’t have an entire team riding on the front over a cat 1 mountain when there are only 30 guys left in the group. Climbers climb and the sprinters sprint, not the other way around.
Almost all of that is wrong - Sky, Nibali, Froome, Tony Martin have shown this statement to be incorrect.
With the sport changing for the better, the young athletes as well as the older athletes will be able to compete fairly. No longer will athletes have to line up knowing they are starting a mile behind the others despite standing on the start line together. We have seen younger cyclists competing at the top level and I believe a lot of their success is due to the sport being cleaner.
Two guys from one team just after being popped for EPO - whilst their own leader is certainly also doping.
We then have Nibali, froome, AC and others all going every bit as fast as Lance and other known dopers...yet Frankie is saying the young riders don't have to face the reality others, previously, faced.
So young riders competing is indicative of what? Andy Schleck doped at 21.
One of the big things people used against lance at the start was his speeds - they were right - yet when others go as fast as lance - silence.
Leaks from pro's all saying the same thing - nothing has changed - it has simply morphed into even more secrecy and better doping techniques.
One thing I do agree with Frankie on is the redacted names...awesome work from travis on that one.
So to answer the headline...not a single thing has changed - Ashenden, Joerg, Floyd have all said this.
I mean how could it have changed?