- Dec 7, 2010
- 5,507
- 0
- 0
http://velonews.competitor.com/2014/10/news/department-justice-strikes-back-armstrong-case_349985
“The False Claims Act is much more ‘pro-Government’ than a traditional contract action would be vis-à-vis a private plaintiff. In other words, the defenses that Armstrong has raised in his answer could be relevant in a breach of contract action, but may not be relevant in a False Claims Act case,” noted Mark Stichel, a Baltimore-based attorney who has litigated civil cases in state and federal courts throughout the U.S., in an an email to VeloNews. “The Government is trying to narrow the case not only because it wants to limit Armstrong’s ultimate ability to defend himself at trial, but to limit the discovery he is seeking. Also, both sides are trying to win the PR war.”
The back and forth between the DOJ and Armstrong attorneys has been exhaustive, and perhaps indicates what’s still to come. “The legal papers that both sides have submitted on this motion and on other motions in the case are well-written and well-researched,” Stichel wrote. “The papers on their face show that both the government and Armstrong are committing substantial resources to the case.”
The power now rests with the judge in the case, United States District Court judge Christopher R.Cooper, who will decide what is admissible and what is not.