Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 485 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jan 8, 2020
5,384
6,152
18,180
I actually get that VO2 max doesn't change with doping. The problem is, however, we don't know his actual VO2 max, as it's never been reported. As such, it could go either way, alien VO2 max or doping. In this context my post "makes sense," having been accused of nonsense. In times of perennial doubt, why not be transparent? What would change reporting that Pogacar officially has a say 99 percent VO2 max? It wouldn't embolden his rivals, but intimidate them, more than they already are. By contrast, not reporting leaves speculation and all the bad thoughts it entails. At times, however, with bad thoughts one guesses correctly.

In any case, Bruyneel on Lemond is rich. He reports as evidence a supposed result of 74.5 in 1988. Lemond was out of himself, depressed, physically and mentally broken, and somehow this negates a 92.5 measure under completely other circumstances? Bruyneel and Armstrong are still bitter and vindictive. They should take a long, hard look in the mirror. Would Lemond have won three Tours, one more than Jonas, one less than Pogacar, with that score? Pathetic.
 
May 22, 2024
538
733
3,780
numbers are not that interesting.you can simply say he is the best or he is on superjuice.choose.but his muscles need real explanation,lmaoo.
 
Jul 7, 2013
8,192
15,056
23,180
I actually get that VO2 max doesn't change with doping. The problem is, however, we don't know his actual VO2 max, as it's never been reported. As such, it could go either way, alien VO2 max or doping. In this context my post "makes sense," having been accused of nonsense.

Actually this is what blood doping methods do: they directly increase VO2max! They affect oxygen transport part of the aerobic system, which is very important in VO2max formula. There's no he has high VO2max so he's clean. It could be actually the other way around.

Pogacar surely has big VO2max (otherwise it would be physically impossible to sustain 6.9 w/kg for 40 minutes, which is purely aerobic effort) but it doesn't mean he's clean or whatever. Obviously artificially boosted VO2max alone is not sufficient: one has to train a lot (preferably when using the boost) so that other crucial zones like Z4 (decisive long climbs) or Z2 (long races) nicely "follow" the max. capacity boost.
 
Last edited:
Feb 20, 2012
53,972
44,347
28,180
Actually this is what blood doping methods do: they directly increase VO2max! They affect oxygen transport part of the aerobic system, which is very important in VO2max formula. There's no he has high VO2max so he's clean. It could be actually the other way around.

Pogacar surely has big VO2max (otherwise it would be physically impossible to sustain 6.9 w/kg for 40 minutes, which is purely aerobic effort) but it doesn't mean he's clean or whatever. Obviously artificially boosted VO2max alone is not sufficient: one has to train a lot (preferably when using the boost) so that other crucial zones like Z4 (decisive long climbs) or Z2 (long races) nicely "follow" the max. capacity boost.
It's simultaneously shocking and it perfectly makes sense that we have to explain that oxygen vector doping would boost VO2 max.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Krzysztof_O
Jan 8, 2020
5,384
6,152
18,180
Actually this is what blood doping methods do: they directly increase VO2max! They affect oxygen transport part of the aerobic system, which is very important in VO2max formula. There's no he has high VO2max so he's clean. It could be actually the other way around.

Pogacar surely has big VO2max (otherwise it would be physically impossible to sustain 6.9 w/kg for 40 minutes, which is purely aerobic effort) but it doesn't mean he's clean or whatever. Obviously artificially boosted VO2max alone is not sufficient: one has to train a lot (preferably when using the boost) so that other crucial zones like Z4 (decisive long climbs) or Z2 (long races) nicely "follow" the max. capacity boost.
So you are saying doping increases VO2 max, but Pog sustaining 6.9 w/kg for 40 minutes can be explained by a naturally stratospheric VO2 alone, sans dopage? This is the point. What his actual VO2 max matters, so why keep it a secret or guessing game?
 
Jul 7, 2013
8,192
15,056
23,180
So you are saying doping increases VO2 max, but Pog sustaining 6.9 w/kg for 40 minutes can be explained by a naturally stratospheric VO2 alone, sans dopage? This is the point. What his actual VO2 max matters, so why keep it a secret or guessing game?

I never said that Pogacar's VO2max was naturally in high 90s range. It's what it's now and his measurement now won't give you an exact info regarding his natural VO2max in the past. I think I already explained a possible cause of 6.9 w/kg for 40 minutes: Boosted VO2max and a lot of training to boost his lower zones as well.
 
Jan 8, 2020
5,384
6,152
18,180
I never said that Pogacar's VO2max was naturally in high 90s range. It's what it's now and his measurement now won't give you an exact info regarding his natural VO2max in the past. I think I already explained a possible cause of 6.9 w/kg for 40 minutes: Boosted VO2max and a lot of training to boost his lower zones as well.
Well, how? I know, you too wonder.