- Jul 27, 2010
- 31
- 0
- 0
Lance is an investor of the Austonian and may have a place their.When he sold his water wasting home he spent at least a few nights their.I know this because he made a direct complaint about construction noise that weekend.
the inverted comma type "" of "" friends.Oldman said:His behavioral pathology would say "not ever" based on a normal frame of reference. Unless he got "happy" when he successfully beat the system or a hated opponent. His friends were clearly dispensable.
ricky riccio, has friends.blackcat said:the inverted comma type "" of "" friends.
"friends". LAnce does not have friends. Just people he can use and fukc^2
All true. Everything you said. However, I was looking for just exactly what it is that he is worth, and what he actually owns. Anyone know? I'll look for the WSJ article by Reed. Anyone post a link to where DIM hangs out these days?blackcat said:Lance, even losing his 60 million day, would have be worth a mint. .
Alpe d'Huez said:Quick question for those in the know. Does anyone have an estimate on Lance's worth? Last I heard it was about $115m.
Also does anyone know how many houses, or houses/condos/dwellings he owns, and roughly what towns they are in? I know of the large home in Austin, and nice one in Aspen, but I think there are others. Does anyone know?
Also, is Lance still the primary owner of Mellow Johnny's? Does he own any other businesses? Or majority partners in similar?
Bosco10 said:Armstrong says he's planning to meet with CIRC once more to secure a ban reduction. But he also says he's moved on, tuned the page, his career is over. All this sounds a bit contradictory. Can someone clarify?
DirtyWorks said:Let's hope for no ban reduction because my estimation is he takes a poorly executed nuclear option if it doesn't.
python said:a treasure trove of data both on armstrong and the us national team btwn '91 and '95 (i'm going to pin it up).
indeed for anyone still interested in sorting out the armstrong natural vs a doped one, it is an invaluable prime source. as i said before,THAT question is the only subject left that still excites me about the despicable human being who's apparently possessed an elite athletic body
but was he a world beater ?
i scanned the 54 pages real fast. in addition to some comments by m. index (which seem sound imo), i'd make the following very tentatively:
-armstrong's physical.
his height and weight controversy from the coyle study are well known. in the document, he was measured at 180 cm/ 80 kg in '91 and at 178 cm/ 77 kg in '95. the little fact that was largely unknown or ignored is that his % body fat in '91 was 6.5% and 4.2% in '95. meaning, he was at the absolute healthy limit when weighing 78 kg, thus putting a question mark to his ability to drop kgs much further as we are told by his fans. i do not exclude musculature reduction starting with his '99 streak, but we need his % body fat to properly evaluate the touted weight reduction contribution to w/kg increase without doping
armstrong's blood chemistry
as already noted, having the hg above 16 and hct almost 49% as long ago as '91 is quite suspicious when his base level was said to be low 40s. additionally, and this was never mentioned before as far as i can deduce, his iron chemistry (not just the iron level but ferritin, tibc etc) support the notion that he took epo in the early 90's. to remind, in those days the standard procedure required massive iron supplements (or injections) along with epo injections. this would cause either an overshot in iron levels or a change in iron metabolism. what i saw is the change bordering on the limit values consistent with the epo usage.
also curious was that armstrong's triglycerides and total cholesterol were abnormally high. this would be indicative of either his consistently crappy diet (unlikely) or...a habitual anabolic steroids use (which are know to raise the values). admittedly, it could also be the result of something else or his natural state (which i doubt).
armstrong's aerobic/anaerobic data
vo2 max of 80 in '91 is confirmed as a true elite mark. but the threshold of 75% and the corresponding watts (340-350) was sub par. in another place the testers even noted that he would need about 400 watts to compete at his level in the itts. they called it an area to develop. perhaps. but the often reported numbers of 450+ watts in the tours are clearly above the training effects (appr 10%) for improving the threshold. massive blood doping would have been required.
the testers also noted his remarkably low lactic acid accumulation and the unusual ability to perform at simulated altitude (related to his unique hg saturation). these could be his true, natural attributes.
there was some other less than remarkable data, including his sub par explosive and anaerobic scores. i also noted that the famous cadence increase was not supported by the pedaling efficiency tests.
overall, more data to both to consider him an elite but not necessarily the world smasher he turned to be.
Hemassist said:Good analysis. The high triglycerides/cholesterol might also tie in the with the higher HCT. Depending on what dosage and stack he was using, it could counter the idea that in 1991 he was using EPO. If he was also using a serious amount of roids back then, he was likely hurting his own performance due to water weight (combined with corticosteroids you get his puffy WC look).
Ferrari probably cut his doses of roids (he was known for loving andriol back then-"Ferrari beans") which was key to getting Lance to perform well. Combined with EPO and careful timing of roids vs corts, you have a stage winner. Still can't explain the tour winner though, I still say the UCI had a role in that.
DirtyWorks said:Owning a bike shop is a hobby in the U.S. It's almost impossible to make more than break-even money as a Trek dealer. Someone running the shop should be doing more stuff there that helps it do a little more than break even. In general though, it's not particularly valuable on its own.
IMO, this is going to be a very difficult question to answer beyond DimSpace's work. Please keep us updated on your findings. There's a dimspace account on twitter that seems to be the same guy.
DirtyWorks said:The answer is it makes perfect sense. If the ban reduction comes, then the story changes. He's working on it. He has to be. He's a champion.
Let's hope for no ban reduction because my estimation is he takes a poorly executed nuclear option if it doesn't.
it is quite possible, and on balance (the pre-ferrari lack of sophistication, the novelty of the drug etc) may even be more probable... he indeed could have stuffed his face with supra-physiological doses of anabolics rather than injecting epo at that stage. after all, the anabolics are well known to predictably albeit moderately hike haematopoiesis.Hemassist said:Good analysis. The high triglycerides/cholesterol might also tie in the with the higher HCT. Depending on what dosage and stack he was using, it could counter the idea that in 1991 he was using EPO.
your mention of corticosteroids had opted me to look at the package again...upon my first read i only glanced through the 50+ pages in about 20 minutes.....(combined with corticosteroids ...careful timing of roids vs corts
python said:and it's documented.
86TDFWinner said:Anyone who thinks Stephanie McIllvane isn't a sad, pathetic, disgusting POS is mentally bankrupt. She's a fraud, and a liar, and a scam.
I've watched SAN, WOW!!!
86TDFWinner said:Anyone who thinks Stephanie McIllvane isn't a sad, pathetic, disgusting POS is mentally bankrupt. She's a fraud, and a liar, and a scam.
I've watched SAN, WOW!!!
She probably didn't lie to the grand jury. It's all happened quite awhile ago, and she had quite a bit of pressure on her when she lied.
I think that a lot of us can accept that she isn't the POS you say she is, without becoming mentally bankrupt.
Trapped between her sons illness, the pressure from Armstrong and her employer, I think we can hold a sense of empathy for her plight.
There aren't many winners in her situation. Especially in a country whereby your health insurance comes with employment.
86TDFWinner said:She actually wished harm or tragedy on another person.
I also hope that one day you have adversity in your life, and you have some type of tragedy
You're trying to destroy one person's life.
This was very disturbing. Some would like to excuse her actions due to the very real pressures of having an autistic son. Personally I would think that someone under such adversity would not wish the same on others.
Odd. Stephanie had no problem watching lance destroy Betsy, Frankie, Mike Anderson, and many more......but when Betsy refused to lie under oath Stephanie calls her to tell her she hopes she gets a baseball bat broken over her head.![]()
86TDFWinner said:She didn't seem to mind that though when she was assisting Wonderboy in covering it all up right? Can't have it both ways, sorry. She's a sad, pathetic POS, and a liar.
She should've thought about that before she decided to hitch her wagon to Wonderboy. See my response above for the rest. She actually wished harm or tragedy on another person......who does that? A sociopath, and psychopath, and most of all: A LIAR.
thehog said:So your expectation is that she stood alone against Armstrong? You would have done the same?
She wished no harm on anybody, she inarticulacy tried to explain that no one could understand the pain that she was in. Which is understandable. Even when Floyd dropped the bombshell it took a good 8-12 months for the tide to turn.
You expected a moher with autistic son to do that?
Sometimes you guys go a little bit too far.
