thehog
BANNED
Bluenote said:All I care for now is real news.
Which we don't have. Anything else is most likely speculation. Hopefully we'll here something soon.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Bluenote said:All I care for now is real news.
Bluenote said:Asking if there is a new update on the case and asking for mostly speculative opinions are two different things.
Of course you (and everyone else) are entitled to their opinions. I just don't care for another re-re-re-hashing of everyone's opinions. I'd rather be buried alive with my eyes taped open, staring at the desert sun.
All I care for now is real news.
Race Radio said:November was the last I heard but that is clearly not happening. Anything legal always takes longer then expected but I still expect it this month.
The bigger question is how much will Bob be award and how long will it take for him to get it
Race Radio said:November was the last I heard but that is clearly not happening. Anything legal always takes longer then expected but I still expect it this month.
The bigger question is how much will Bob be award and how long will it take for him to get it
Benotti69 said:I guess Bob is already thinking about how to get it.
thehog said:And Armstrong is thinking how to hold on to it. Even if the panel makes an award, Armstrong will most likely appeal back through the courts. There's a long way to go to my original prediction.
The chequebook won't be coming out anytime soon. And to that point; that fact encourages a settlement on mutal terms. Can SCA wait longer for the money? I assume so as it's already been 5 years since Landis opened up the dam.
Race Radio said:November was the last I heard but that is clearly not happening. Anything legal always takes longer then expected but I still expect it this month.
The bigger question is how much will Bob be award and how long will it take for him to get it
Bluenote said:Let's re-re-rehash everyone's opinions on SCA...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=omECDMfbu4k
No, let's not.
thehog said:Odd, seeing you posted to a public forum looking for updates and to begin a discussion.
You do know what a question mark at the end of sentence means, yes?
Bluenote said:Hog, I'm not bored enough to bite.
And don't call me Shirley.
Race Radio said:http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...overy-dispute-us-federal-government/19866977/
It has devolved into 5 graders saying "I know you are but what am I"
Lance's lawyers remind me of Lance the bike racer......dirty
Race Radio said:
According to the government's legal team, Armstrong has refused to turn over records related to his use of those drugs. The government also says he is refusing to turn over e-mails to and from those who were aware of his drug use and helped him conceal it.
To illustrate their point, government attorneys cited a conference call with Armstrong's attorneys on Oct. 31. They said they asked Armstrong for e-mails to and from Thom Weisel, a California businessman who bankrolled Armstrong's cycling team.
After years of denials, Armstrong admitted doping in January 2013. He was stripped of all seven of his victories in the Tour de France in 2012.
mewmewmew13 said:I am reminded of effing idiots.
and Lance understands these tactics...lowball
Archibald said:I see what you did there
reckon we'll here next tuesday
thehog said:Probably not. There's a long way to go as we all know.
Race Radio said:http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...overy-dispute-us-federal-government/19866977/
It has devolved into 5 graders saying "I know you are but what am I"
Lance's lawyers remind me of Lance the bike racer......dirty
D-Queued said:I was going to post something about looking up-thread for one of your previous posts on this. But then re-thought that as when it comes to looking back up things a colonoscopy is probably less painful.
Anyhow, I thought you had said you weren't expecting anything until the New Year?
Was I mis-remembering?
Dave.
That's usually due to a headwind or a tailwind though.Race Radio said:Sometime stuff that you think will be quick takes forever and sometimes stuff you think will take forever will be fast.
There "are" emails, or there "could be"?Race Radio said:Of course the other bombshell is that there are USPS emails that could clear him or expand the target list.
Granville57 said:That's usually due to a headwind or a tailwind though.
There "are" emails, or there "could be"?
To further that topic:
If USPS internal emails revealed that they knew (or highly suspected) that Lance was doping, but decided to except the risk of that in the interest of riding the wave of awesomeness and media coverage, does that get Lance & Co. off the hook?
Archibald said:Why is there this wrangling over emails? Can't the Feds just subpoena(sp?) the servers/hard drives of both parties and search them for themselves?