Oprah.thehog said:From a legal point of view, I don’t think it would be possible for him to to write checks. It would be an admission of guilt and he can’t do that.
It's not USPS's case. How hard is this to understand? Flandis is using a law that is supposed to protect tax dollars.yaco said:I still wonder how out of the myriad of companies that sponsored cycling teams who had systematic doping programs only US Postal suffered brand damage - Continue lighting the flame.
fmk_RoI said:Oprah.thehog said:From a legal point of view, I don’t think it would be possible for him to to write checks. It would be an admission of guilt and he can’t do that.
His apology already 'validates' what they say.thehog said:fmk_RoI said:Oprah.thehog said:From a legal point of view, I don’t think it would be possible for him to to write checks. It would be an admission of guilt and he can’t do that.
With the context of the upcoming trial the Andreu’s could still be part of the trial, a payment to them would/could validate any testimony they are to make. Has nothing to do with Oprah, the admission of doping does not prove out that USPS suffered harm or loss because of said doping.
fmk_RoI said:His apology already 'validates' what they say.thehog said:fmk_RoI said:Oprah.thehog said:From a legal point of view, I don’t think it would be possible for him to to write checks. It would be an admission of guilt and he can’t do that.
With the context of the upcoming trial the Andreu’s could still be part of the trial, a payment to them would/could validate any testimony they are to make. Has nothing to do with Oprah, the admission of doping does not prove out that USPS suffered harm or loss because of said doping.
Spot the person still drinking the Tygart Kool-Aid...Freddythefrog said:the biggest sporting fraud ever
Yes - guilty ! It sounded good though !fmk_RoI said:Spot the person still drinking the Tygart Kool-Aid...Freddythefrog said:the biggest sporting fraud ever
Actually, it sounds like an insult to all the really important frauds, like the East German doping...but if it makes you feel warm and fuzzy, that's the important thing.Freddythefrog said:Yes - guilty ! It sounded good though !fmk_RoI said:Spot the person still drinking the Tygart Kool-Aid...Freddythefrog said:the biggest sporting fraud ever
fmk_RoI said:Actually, it sounds like an insult to all the really important frauds, like the East German doping...but if it makes you feel warm and fuzzy, that's the important thing.Freddythefrog said:Yes - guilty ! It sounded good though !fmk_RoI said:Spot the person still drinking the Tygart Kool-Aid...Freddythefrog said:the biggest sporting fraud ever
fmk_RoI said:His apology already 'validates' what they say.thehog said:fmk_RoI said:Oprah.thehog said:From a legal point of view, I don’t think it would be possible for him to to write checks. It would be an admission of guilt and he can’t do that.
With the context of the upcoming trial the Andreu’s could still be part of the trial, a payment to them would/could validate any testimony they are to make. Has nothing to do with Oprah, the admission of doping does not prove out that USPS suffered harm or loss because of said doping.
Got any proof of that statement? the obsession is hard like a ... never mind but you get the point. humping up on fence posts and such. Much like phineas and ferb along with gregs cammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmio.86TDFWinner said:Wonderboy still needs more time to funnel $$ overseas into various "secret"accounts.fmk_RoI said:And LA punts the ball another six months down the road: trial won't start until May 2018 now.![]()
I heard he was sneaking the money out of Texas hidden in the pockets of Brian Cookson's Team Sky jerseys.Semper Fidelis said:Got any proof of that statement? the obsession is hard like a ... never mind but you get the point. humping up on fence posts and such. Much like phineas and ferb along with gregs cammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmio.86TDFWinner said:Wonderboy still needs more time to funnel $$ overseas into various "secret"accounts.fmk_RoI said:And LA punts the ball another six months down the road: trial won't start until May 2018 now.![]()
Yah, and LA's doping came as such a shock when he fessed up to Oprah, blind-sided us all.Benotti69 said:East German doping was obvious to all.
fmk_RoI said:Yah, and LA's doping came as such a shock when he fessed up to Oprah, blind-sided us all.Benotti69 said:East German doping was obvious to all.
fmk_RoI said:Yah, and LA's doping came as such a shock when he fessed up to Oprah, blind-sided us all.Benotti69 said:East German doping was obvious to all.
Benotti69 said:fmk_RoI said:Actually, it sounds like an insult to all the really important frauds, like the East German doping...but if it makes you feel warm and fuzzy, that's the important thing.Freddythefrog said:Yes - guilty ! It sounded good though !fmk_RoI said:Spot the person still drinking the Tygart Kool-Aid...Freddythefrog said:the biggest sporting fraud ever
I would've thought USA were and are the biggest sporting fraud.
East German doping was obvious to all.
Armstrong might just be the biggest sporting fraud athlete, singular, but boy Froome is pushing him for that one!
fmk_RoI said:It's not USPS's case. How hard is this to understand? Flandis is using a law that is supposed to protect tax dollars.yaco said:I still wonder how out of the myriad of companies that sponsored cycling teams who had systematic doping programs only US Postal suffered brand damage - Continue lighting the flame.
Name them, and cite the relevant basis for legal challenges for those in other jurisdictions.yaco said:fmk_RoI said:It's not USPS's case. How hard is this to understand? Flandis is using a law that is supposed to protect tax dollars.yaco said:I still wonder how out of the myriad of companies that sponsored cycling teams who had systematic doping programs only US Postal suffered brand damage - Continue lighting the flame.
I fully understand that is US Postal is a Government agency - Other teams have been sponsored by Government agencies and nil has happened.
fmk_RoI said:Name them, and cite the relevant basis for legal challenges for those in other jurisdictions.
ScienceIsCool said:fmk_RoI said:Name them, and cite the relevant basis for legal challenges for those in other jurisdictions.
Yes, father.
Do national lotteries count? What about Astana? How many words do you require for your essay and which style guide do you prefer? Geez. It's not like you provide any references for your grand pronouncements...
John Swanson
Gosh.thehog said:[None the less it’s unlikely Kasshsjsjdgdhstan would have a Federal whistle blowers statute!