Hello?? Wake up and understand that defense lawyers are arguing this imaginary beyond all doubt standard ALL THE TIME! They are not explicitly saying they are, but listen to their arguments? How do you think OJ and Casey Anthoney got off? How in the heck can they question DNA evidence? Shoddy handling or contamination does not produce DNA matches either. So then it's a police frame up? And yet people are willing to throw DNA evidence out the window? Why, because they're simple people confused and deceived by unscrupulous defense attorneys. You don't think Barry Scheck knew he was arguing complete bs in the OJ trial?
You've been arguing for Armstrong for months. Delusional IMO. There is NO doubt in the world we live in, where the sun comes up every morning, there's 24 hours in a day. 365 days a year, gravity is in effect and so on, that Lance Armstrong is not guilty. There are too many people coming forward, too many positive tests, too many witnesses to fraudulent payoffs, organized doping.
You really think this is going to get better for Armstrong when his attorney's cross examine witnesses? First off, there's going to be an endless parade of them. He's going to call all of them vindictive haters? Please.
Evidently you're one of these people who believes in smoking guns? There is no such thing. All evidence in the hands of a defense attorney is equivocal, and as we've seen they'll argue anything no matter how absurd.
Might he get off? Yeah, because people want to reinforce their prejudices or practice jury nullification, but it's clear to anyone awake that he's guilty.