I think the first lap really hurt van Aert, also the small accelarations overall - van der Poel set the pace most of the time, and while van Aert could follow him it was van der Poel who could ride his own rhythm.
Before the final sprint I thought van Aert looked a lot better in the last lap. Van der Poel seemed to hurt quite a bit. I would not necessarily have bet on van der Poel in the sprint, not sure if van Aert simply messed up the timing there, whether it is true he was focused on the barriers and not really mentally prepared for the sprint - maybe he simply thought he could win the sprint and didn't have a real plan how to do it - or maybe he was simply more tired than it looked like.
Overall he definitely rode too passively, but, well, hindsight.
Van der Poel led the race practically from start to finish. Despite the race not being that selective it looked like a dominant performance in the end.
Before the final sprint I thought van Aert looked a lot better in the last lap. Van der Poel seemed to hurt quite a bit. I would not necessarily have bet on van der Poel in the sprint, not sure if van Aert simply messed up the timing there, whether it is true he was focused on the barriers and not really mentally prepared for the sprint - maybe he simply thought he could win the sprint and didn't have a real plan how to do it - or maybe he was simply more tired than it looked like.
Overall he definitely rode too passively, but, well, hindsight.
Van der Poel led the race practically from start to finish. Despite the race not being that selective it looked like a dominant performance in the end.