What are you contributing by bringing up other riders results?I don’t know what you’re on about. Comparisons are ways we make judgements about things that are unknown or disputed. I’m not trying to predict or say I know anything for sure, but wanted to counter someone saying that Van Aert was in a big decline and unlikely to win big races. You don’t think my comparisons are valid that’s fine (I’m to lazy right now to look at age if of PR winners for last twenty years.)
What exactly are you contributing to this discussion? O course Van Aert will do what his is going to do, and whatever we say here doesn’t affect that. But if you don’t think there’s any point in discussing future outcomes based on the information we can glean, why even participate in this discussion.?
It is about Van Aert. Not other riders.
What Van Aert does has nothing to do with history of other riders. Especially not such anomalies as Cancellara and Valverde.
Van Aerts success or no success will be totally independent on what your point is.
Last edited: