OK so everyone here know I have been one of the biggest wva detractors on the forum the last couple of years.
But I think it's clear that if VDP was here in the best shape he would win, the course just suits his capacities perfectly. Twisty, short explosive efforts repeated a ridiculous number of times over 270km, bad weather, steep climbs but never longer than 30 seconds.
I don't really understand how wva beats a top level VDP. 2nd was about the best he could get and he got it. Maybe he did a bit too much work at some points in the race but not like he made a silly mistake. He is a similar talent but not the same kind of rider as VDP.
In the past seasons I was calling him Belgian pozzato because he was incredibly physically strong but wasted opportunities with defensive and unintelligent racing, poor decision making, lack of initiative. I think however this season he just had a bit of bad luck and faced 2 simply stronger opponents. Van der poel and pogacar both have their best years right now, and with the exception of roubaix, where wva had his flattire, the courses of the other big races favour their repeated accelerations