Generalist? Mercx was a generalist De Vlaeminck was NOT! His palmares are almost exclusively classics and the sprinters jersey in GT's. A true classics harda$$.Echoes said:If the likes of Merckx, Gimondi or De Vlaeminck were generalists, it's because they were multi talents and stronger than the average riders. That's all.
I have a tremendous amount of admiration for RdV's accomplishments but he comes across like a tired old fart. When Mercx, Hinault or Kelly gets interviewed they are far more classier and in touch and maybe why this is the case "His only involvement in cycling was as a mentor for some rider from Zimbabwe but watched the Tour of Flanders at home, claiming he had not been invited by the organisers."