Howard Thomas said:
Cavendish does not have another event but I wonder if Bradley W has not ruined his chances in the TT?
A little unfair on Cav. He would have said beforehand (did say) that the only chance of a medal was in a bunch sprint (for any of the sprinters) and he regarded the medal as a team one. I am wondering if there should not be two events? One for the likes of Vino or Sagan to sore an individual road medal and one as a team sprint event?
Otherwise the two types of rider are ruled out depending on the design of the course. For that matter, a straight climb of 20 kms could give the likes of Schlecks and Contador an Olympic opportunity. Bit difficult to organise this in the Netherlands of course (if they had the games)!
Olympic courses are like Worlds courses. Sometimes they suit one type of rider, sometimes they suit another. Schleck could have had a chance in Beijing, but didn't take it, Cav could have had a chance here, but didn't take it. Two completely different types of cyclist.
As I've said several times, and shall continue to say, the Worlds (and by extension, the Olympics, as a special attraction) are like a Monument. And as there is a monument for everybody - every type of rider has a Monument they can win provided they're good enough - then Worlds/Olympics courses should be like this. They shouldn't provide a course flatter than Milan-San Remo. But they shouldn't provide a course more mountainous than Il Lombardia.
The 2016 Olympics RR course will be in Rio, and is probably likely to be quite hilly. But the 2020 candidate cities are Madrid (we saw what the Worlds there were like, and it was a sprint from a reduced bunch), Istanbul (liable to be mostly flat) and Tokyo (could have some decent sized climbs, but if they finish in the city then it will be a flat run-in like yesterday).