The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Squire said:So, the stage winner has a 'De' in his name...
yaco said:Cort has been off the pace so far in 2019, so the win has to be considered a surprise.
Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
LaFlorecita said:Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
LaFlorecita said:Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
They're medium-height riders.Krokro said:LaFlorecita said:Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
Valverde or Teuns are not that small so I'm not pretty sure it's related.
Anderis said:They're medium-height riders.Krokro said:LaFlorecita said:Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
Valverde or Teuns are not that small so I'm not pretty sure it's related.
Most of the tall guys who can climb like Wiggins, Hesjedal, Van Garderen, Dumoulin etc. are usually diesel-type. Although Hesjedal was really good in hilly classics at some point of his career.
LaFlorecita said:Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
Generally, any rider who fills a really narrow niche is also not world class within that niche, the only exceptions usually being sprinters.Broccolidwarf said:LaFlorecita said:Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
"Punchy" is a very loaded word to use in cycling, as it usually refers to this rider type:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puncheur
It's generally used to describe riders who are slightly too heavy to be proper climbers, and will thus fail on the longer climbs..... so no, it is actually the reverse of what you describe.
That having been said, it's a sliding scale, and these days, many riders are hybrids, that cannot be pigeonholed as one thing or another.
At 25.5 kilometres, the riders face a predominantly flat ITT, although there is a hill in the second half and the route concludes with a short rise to the line.
The first part of the route is pan-flat, while the intermediate climb is 3 kilometres with an average gradient of 3%. The hill is crested near the Abbaye de Saint-Michel de Frigolet, which is also the location of the only time check after 14.5 kilometres.
Following the descent the riders hit a false flat, but as they come storming down the descent it will have no impact. The last 500 metres are something else, as this section rises to the finish line at 7%.
IMO while a puncheur is always punchy, a punchy rider is not necessarily a puncheur. A climber can also be punchy.Broccolidwarf said:LaFlorecita said:Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
"Punchy" is a very loaded word to use in cycling, as it usually refers to this rider type:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puncheur
It's generally used to describe riders who are slightly too heavy to be proper climbers, and will thus fail on the longer climbs..... so no, it is actually the reverse of what you describe.
That having been said, it's a sliding scale, and these days, many riders are hybrids, that cannot be pigeonholed as one thing or another.
tobydawq said:LaFlorecita said:Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
It's Gianni Moscon who is most punchy.
Sorry.
LaFlorecita said:IMO while a puncheur is always punchy, a punchy rider is not necessarily a puncheur. A climber can also be punchy.Broccolidwarf said:LaFlorecita said:Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
"Punchy" is a very loaded word to use in cycling, as it usually refers to this rider type:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puncheur
It's generally used to describe riders who are slightly too heavy to be proper climbers, and will thus fail on the longer climbs..... so no, it is actually the reverse of what you describe.
That having been said, it's a sliding scale, and these days, many riders are hybrids, that cannot be pigeonholed as one thing or another.
How would you describe Purito, Yates, Valverde? They are punchy in the same way as Ciccone. And among climbers, it's usually the smaller guys that are more punchy (or at least that's my impression).
LaFlorecita said:IMO while a puncheur is always punchy, a punchy rider is not necessarily a puncheur. A climber can also be punchy.Broccolidwarf said:LaFlorecita said:Isn't it usually the smaller guys that are most punchy?armchairclimber said:Good to see Ciccone riding so aggressively this season. He's quite punchy for a little fella. He must be Trek's top rider so far.
"Punchy" is a very loaded word to use in cycling, as it usually refers to this rider type:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puncheur
It's generally used to describe riders who are slightly too heavy to be proper climbers, and will thus fail on the longer climbs..... so no, it is actually the reverse of what you describe.
That having been said, it's a sliding scale, and these days, many riders are hybrids, that cannot be pigeonholed as one thing or another.
How would you describe Purito, Yates, Valverde? They are punchy in the same way as Ciccone. And among climbers, it's usually the smaller guys that are more punchy (or at least that's my impression).