It makes a lot of sense at 66/1.How does an each way bet make sense then? With an each way bet, you place two bets: one on the rider winning, and one on the rider placing (top 3/4 whatever the terms are). So half of what you bet is on the rider winning - practically cutting your price in half of you don't think your rider has a chance of winning.
Yeah, I miss that; you'd see the Domane, Roubaix & Synapse all wheeled out for this race.......do you remember when we saw weird innovative different bikes at Scheldeprijs, riders rode the bike they'd ride the next Sunday on the cobbles
now it's almost all aero frames, no different frames and wild solutions for Roubaix
Love how you have to have watched (not just read about) enough cycling to understand the UAE team refernceso team strength:
Lidl: sorry, its still discount.
Alpecin: Group sickness or whatever.
Visma: Well, they have to bring in a teenager.
UAE: shiny teeth, but otherwise a one man band.
Here is the real deal from 1996:
View: https://youtu.be/QGpW-88VioQ
I think that would be true for any major race outside of Roubaix. Between the wind, crashes, punctures it's almost impossible to say in what situation the race will be after Arenberg and how much tactics will be involved. All other monuments are (unfortunately) pretty straight forwards these days. In Roubaix that's impossible.The fact there is no massive favorite is actually not favouring an outsider, as there are 2 main favorites (mvdp and pog, even though pog is new to the race so it could be that hopes are too high) and 2-3 more favorites / podium contenders (wva, pedersen). So those will all ride and the second tier favorites even have to attack / anticipate themselves, so there won’t be any room for third tier favorites attacks, I fear.
Ps: no disrespect, just trying to be clear about the pecking order.
Het Nieuwsblad's star rating to tomorrow. It gets a bit random towards the end
* **** van der Poel
**** Pogacar, van Aert
*** Ganna, Pedersen, Stuyven
** Küng, Philipsen, van Baarle, F. Vermeersch
* Teunissen, Wellens, Fedorov, Meeus, Pithie
If Pog manages to get away and stay away Cancellara style,he might win his first Roubaix.
Fedorov was 14th last year. He had a mechanical in Arneberg and was only Astana rider in the front group. He has shown much better form this year, so I think he is a very interesting outsider for a top 6 tomorrow!A bit?
Fedorov was 14th last year. He had a mechanical in Arneberg and was only Astana rider in the front group. He has shown much better form this year, so I think he is a very interesting outsider for a top 6 tomorrow!
will be interesting to see indeed. I guess equipment may be an issue for XDS' first Roubaix, though, but they seem to be using established tires/wheels etc at least.Fedorov was 14th last year. He had a mechanical in Arneberg and was only Astana rider in the front group. He has shown much better form this year, so I think he is a very interesting outsider for a top 6 tomorrow!
Other than putting Kung into the others group I think that list is bang on.I always like to follow our forum predictions because most of us (forum members) follow cycling all season and know how PR is raced. So:
* * * * * - Van der Poel
* * * * - Pogacar, Van Aert, Pedersen
* * * - Ganna, Phillipsen
* * - Stuyven, Küng
* - Others (Gianni, Florian, Politt, Tarling, etc)