It probably does help that MvdP has won this race three times in a rowI posted earlier, but such class by Mathieu to congratulate Wout. I believe he was the first rider there to congratulate him.
It probably does help that MvdP has won this race three times in a rowI posted earlier, but such class by Mathieu to congratulate Wout. I believe he was the first rider there to congratulate him.
That big hunk of granite will look great on his mantle. A lifetime achievement.Well deserved. He finally got to winning one of the cobbled monuments after so many near-misses.
What a dark day for cycling.
🤣🤣No wonder when you have to ride on your own for 80km.
And it's almost a certainty none of these 20-30 people do any self-reflecting about their conduct here but just continue to spout the same boring stuff.Today there's no criticism that the slowest and most coocked cyclist took turns at the frot.Sometimes we should try to be a little more objective.
It's been a bit sad to see so much complaining in this thread. It was clear that Pogacar was more coocked and that Van Aert was faster.
Yes, though since he's benefitted from others' bad luck in the past here I don't think he will be too fussed. He doesn't take losses particularly badlyMVP has a disaster season until today. However, he would probably win this race.
Well but the Laporte card, as you say, was indeed silly - I don’t think it mattered. Laporte was not going to win the sprint from the group, the chance to win for the team was always way higher with WvA from a 2 man group.He had a guy in the group behind. Sure, playing the Christophe Laporte card there when van der Poel was there too is a bit silly, but it was up to Pogačar to call his bluff and see just how serious he was about playing that card. Which he never did, so Wout continued to play it. That's on Tadej.
Class act Wout.Wout dedicated his win to Goelarts, who passed away during the 2018 edition.
Laporte is slower than Pedersen and VDP.He had a guy in the group behind. Sure, playing the Christophe Laporte card there when van der Poel was there too is a bit silly, but it was up to Pogačar to call his bluff and see just how serious he was about playing that card. Which he never did, so Wout continued to play it. That's on Tadej.
Still, it was a genuine act on his part, and I was happy to see it.It probably does help that MvdP has won this race three times in a row
Exactly as he should have done. Sandbag a bit, make Pog work, beat him in the sprint. MasterclassPogacar was doing all the work. Van Art was only wheelsucking and whenever he was in Front the gap imidiately started going down.
New to watching Paris Roubaix, I see. You'll learn more about it, as you grow up...if you grow up.Wout van Asterix is so lucky Pogacar had that slip early in Carefour de l Arbre. Decided the race.
he did it
no mistakes , calm for once
Pogacar kept trying to drop Wout in the cobbles, so Wout had less reason to work fully. He had to save his energy, because that's Pogacar attacking.Well but the Laporte card, as you say, was indeed silly - I don’t think it mattered. Laporte was not going to win the sprint from the group, the chance to win for the team was always way higher with WvA from a 2 man group.
But Pogacar did too much indeed. I just think its independent of Laporte.
Interesting you single out that poster going one way instead of the 30 posters going the other way for the last 5 hours. Something to consider...if you grow up.New to watching Paris Roubaix, I see. You'll learn more about it, as you grow up...if you grow up.
It’s was so nice to see and typical of Mathieu. The respect he and Wout have for each other is immense.I posted earlier, but such class by Mathieu to congratulate Wout. I believe he was the first rider there to congratulate him.
