- Apr 9, 2009
Jonker doesn't have any "evidence." He claims that he never saw Lance dope personally, which is far from any sort of "evidence" that Lance is clean.SpartacusRox said:I had to laugh when I saw the Patrick Jonker snippet on CN this morning because I knew without even checking what the response would be.
I was correct of course, the response was right down the line of what the posters accuse Lance of.
1. Firstly character assasination of Jonker
2. Dismissal of his comments
3. Immediate assumption that Lance MUST have paid him or coerced him to support his side of the story
4. Inferring that his evidence will be overwhelmed by the weight of evidence from the prosecution.
Most of the usual suspects in there of course and I am sure more of the Lance flame boys will put their two cents worth in during the day.
The reality of course is that Jonker is not just an "old hack" ( I liked that one), he is well respected in the Australasian cycling community.
I am predicting that there will be a number of others like him who will be happy to stand up and support Lance, witnesses with high credibility rather than ex dopers with an axe to grind.
But by all means please keep grasping at straws in your posts - you are one of the most amusingly desperate fanboys I've ever heard from and it's really interesting to see how your brain works with these posts of yours. Please keep them coming as the comic relief from you is always welcome.