Bingo.wayahead said:I read a several theories of what is his problem:
1. It has something to do with a distance.
Sagan is way beyond EBH's situation- Eddy's problem is simply SKY- they literally stalled him.wayahead said:What do you think? And what should Sagan do? What trade-offs to do not to became next EBH?
Yup, and also the cobbles hurt too much too, especially the flatter version of them.hfer07 said:Bingo.
On all the classics he's ridden, he seems to lose power dramatically at the end- which is no other than his young engine not fully developed to have what Cancellara & Boone have to finish the job. He'll be fine in two years![]()
But where did he waste energy at San Remo? I think it is the distance. He will get there in a few years.Netserk said:I don't think the distance is the problem. The problem is all the energy he wastes unnecessarily. He needs to be better to conserve his energy and use it at the right time.
I think he was just simply in worse shape than last year. No year is going to be the same. Last year he was in über beast mode in Strade and extremely impressive in Tirreno. Not nearly as good this year.fauniera said:But where did he waste energy at San Remo? I think it is the distance. He will get there in a few years.
Yeah, i had that impression as well, but then he was really strong at E3.Netserk said:I think he was just simply in worse shape than last year.
still, the e3 is like 30km less i think compared to RvV. If he gains little more tactics and endurance, then he will be able to handle the "top favourite" position.fauniera said:Yeah, i had that impression as well, but then he was really strong at E3.
I don't think he was that strong there. But he didn't waste any energy unnecessarily, and the race unfolded perfectly for him. He was strong, but far from the strongest.fauniera said:Yeah, i had that impression as well, but then he was really strong at E3.
well, I think the distance is problem too, but it's only one of the problems with less weight. The main problems is as you say, the form not being that of last year and the tactics. If he avoided only one of these problems yesterday, it would probably be enough for him to hang onto cancellara on kwaremont this year. And that including the endurance, even as small as the problem is. He needed only 5 or 10 more seconds the start of the steeper part of the kwaremont. He seemed to have equal pace to cancellara on the rest of the climb, and although he was suffering on patterberg, cancellara wasn't looking that impressive either there. Perhaps, the fastest on patterberg yesterday was kristoff. Does anybody have the times?Netserk said:I don't think he was that strong there. But he didn't waste any energy unnecessarily, and the race unfolded perfectly for him. He was strong, but far from the strongest.
I really don't think the distance is the problem, but only that his form is worse than last year, and that he needs to race smarter.
E3 = 213 kmtomorrow said:still, the e3 is like 30km less i think compared to RvV. If he gains little more tactics and endurance, then he will be able to handle the "top favourite" position.
Actually, I think he might do well in P-R know. He got lectures from tactics yesterday. Also he won't be that marked. One could hardly consider him as favourite there, so he could actually enjoy good race in the shadows of big guns after a very long time. We shall see.
Last year's GW was shortened to 183km.Netserk said:And last year's GW was 233km and he was bossing it.
Lol, I had totally forgotten thatVolderke said:Last year's GW was shortened to 183km.
I'm not that guy but it seems they really experimented this winter:Flamin said:Where is this guy who claimed before the race that Sagan would fail and that they were rumours about Sagan and a few other teammates being unhappy about the winter training regime? Seems like there might be something to it.