Howard Thomas said:
As a casual viewer of the sport I find the P and P commentary very helpful indeed. On the irritations, you have to remember that they have to keep talking and repeating information as otherwise there would be no commentary for edited highlights and the bookends of commercial breaks.
Just go and make a cup of tea when the boring bits feature. I (and the other millions) just like looking at France to decide where to take my holidays (it was the same on the Vuelta).
If you find P and P irritating, what about the antipodean chap on the Vuelta. His intonations were amazingly illogical. I have tried to imitate them but its an impossibility. Actually I found it quite fascinating as well as irritating!
A) Thank-you for confirming the casual-listerners-think-P&P-are-good phenomenon.
B) True P&P have to keep talking....also true that that they repeat stuff...
NOT true that they have to keep talking by repeating stuff! There is more than enough stuff in this sport to talk about to avoid the endless repetition we hear.
(*) Disclaimer: actually P&P will tell you they repeat stuff because they're often commentating to multiple TV stations at the same time (they've even used a divider between themselves to assist this...which meant they sometimes haven't known what the other guy's on about at any given moment). The point? Why should we have to hear the same thing over and over again just because they want to make some more dosh? Sure making money is always tempting, but that doesn't mean the commentary doesn't suck for us. If you can't do it right, just don't do it.
C) "antipodean chap"? "illogical intonations"? Yea-ah, maybe you need to read the rest of this thread
