Photography

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
A

Anonymous

Guest
2r6p7oh.jpg


1z3z53d.jpg


2lw5g5y.jpg
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
craig1985 said:
Partly because I don't have the programs (either to buy it, nor the bandwidth to d/l it):p But it is interesting that I'm friends with a pro photographer, and he doesn't believe in it too much, with a preference to not doing it at all (he obviously has photoshop), as if you do it too much it takes away the quality of the actual photo and instead turn it into a piece of art that you would stick into a museum. But then I guess there are some photographers who prefer to use film and a dark room.

For me, I like to see the actual photo at hand and see how good the person's skill is, not a prgram to make themselves look good. But in saying that though, some of the post-processing of photos on here have been very good and make the photos have a different perspective. If I were to do it, it would only be very subtle and make any changes look minor. Like the photos I posted, the outside ofthe windows were dirty, so I would look to remove it or any sun reflection that was on the windows. That would be about it.

BTW, hektoren are you a pro photographer, or somebody who has been doing it for a while?

I've been a keen amateur photographer since 1966. For the last ten years I've been paid for most of my photography, but I'm not even close to break even if you look at my expenditure for expensive and esoteric glassware. (We're talking six figures here, even in Euro)

As a photographer you'll only be judged by your end product, whether it's on paper or screen. How you got there is of no interest for a prospective customer, a gallery or whatnot. No link in the chain, from visualized idea to the finished product, is more important than the others. Some times a truly spectacular photo needs very little post-processing. Some times a truly spectatular photo needs a lot of post-processing. Knowing what to do and when to do it, will be second-nature, once you've got the experience.
Some of my photo-friends (some of them pro "togs", two of them quite famous) have "the eye", a visual instinct. They know immediately when a "Kodak-moment" is about to happen, and they leave with the best shot possible, every time. Every detail is just right. Composition, aperture, shutter...technically it's as good as it gets. Visually appealing and immensely "commercial"; their photos sell like hotcakes. All of them, however, regard post-processing as an integral part of photography. A tool in their toolchest, no more, no less. A tool that can enhance but also destroy. Just as no expensive chisel and fantastic slab of marble will turn you into a new Michelangelo, no computer program will ever make mediocre photos look good. What matters is your creative input.
 

ravens

BANNED
Nov 22, 2009
780
0
0
hektoren said:
Enough talk, here's another photo of mine, and this one needed absolutely no post-processing, she's just perfect:
5291608-lg.jpg


Sweet mother of God, keep her away from tiger. Put her behind a bicycle, any bicycle, and she can just shut down the babes on bikes thread forever. That's tough to top.

A beautiful face like that is a treasure beyond words.
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
ravens said:
Sweet mother of God, keep her away from tiger. Put her behind a bicycle, any bicycle, and she can just shut down the babes on bikes thread forever. That's tough to top.

A beautiful face like that is a treasure beyond words.

I've got nude photos of her as well, but I won't post them here! You'll wet your pants!
 

ravens

BANNED
Nov 22, 2009
780
0
0
hektoren said:
I've got nude photos of her as well, but I won't post them here! You'll wet your pants!

Send me a link via PM. For God's sake, man, I'm married. I haven't seen a nude woman in years! :D
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hektoren said:
I've got nude photos of her as well, but I won't post them here! You'll wet your pants!

Yea, well I have the secret of eternal happiness, but none for you!
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
Thoughtforfood said:
Yea, well I have the secret of eternal happiness, but none for you!

ETERNAL happiness? Hope you've got enough clean underwear, then!
I'm a much more here-and-now-guy.
:D
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hektoren said:
ETERNAL happiness? Hope you've got enough clean underwear, then!
I'm a much more here-and-now-guy.
:D

Clean underwear is the secret...dang.:D
 

ravens

BANNED
Nov 22, 2009
780
0
0
hektoren said:
Ok, then. I'll put you out of your misery! Mail me at hektor1890@hotmail.com so I know your address, and I'll send you a few. Your view of your missus and what you're missing out on, in the sad excuse of an existence you call "life", might change though. Be forewarned! We're not talking pilot's training "touch-and-go" here, this is more touch-and-come.
:D

I like to exaggerate the miseries of marriage. Single people don't realize what they are getting into until it is too late.

I hope to add glad tidings to the "What did you get in the (e)-post today?" thread soon. :D

haha
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
craig1985 said:
Good photos TFF. Where were they taken?

BTW hektoren, what is her name?

Sorry, her name, address and phone no. is dealt with on a strictly need to know-basis.:D
For a fee I might be persuaded to divulge juicy details, but on the other hand.....it's probably not worth it.:eek: Yeah, right.
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
ravens said:
stalker alert

I'm stalker-aware, but thank you, anyhow!
I've received one e-mail, and returned some photos, and somewhere among the constituents of this forum there's a guy that'll wake up blind tomorrow!:D
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
craig1985 said:
Good photos TFF. Where were they taken?

BTW hektoren, what is her name?

Thank you! I thook all of those in Bertesgarten. We didn't go up to the Eagles Nest, but I want to go back one day and do that.
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
Thoughtforfood said:
Thank you! I thook all of those in Bertesgarten. We didn't go up to the Eagles Nest, but I want to go back one day and do that.

I believe that's Berchtesgaden
;)
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hektoren said:
I believe that's Berchtesgaden
;)

I just Googled both and both come up. I don't speak German so I guess if you do, then I defer to you. However, considering both do come up as spellings, maybe cut a guy some slack. Maybe I'll pick some town in Mississippi named after a Native American tribe and ask you to spell it off the cuff...:rolleyes:
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
Thoughtforfood said:
I just Googled both and both come up. I don't speak German so I guess if you do, then I defer to you. However, considering both do come up as spellings, maybe cut a guy some slack. Maybe I'll pick some town in Mississippi named after a Native American tribe and ask you to spell it off the cuff...:rolleyes:

I stand corrected! I really didn't know that. Is it a Firenze/Florence-thing? The english version of a german name? I don't know. I'm not German myself, and know next to nothing about native American names. You can have all the slack you want!;)