Havetts said:What is topic?
9000ft said:When there is no longer big money in winning international cycling races.
Fortyninefourteen said:This thread is exciting as that recent Bond movie...what was it called again?
9000ft said:When there is no longer big money in winning international cycling races.
ElChingon said:It was called; "The year that ended doping, 2006!"
Its oddly missing from my NetFlix database![]()
Fortyninefourteen said:Every time this thread gets interesting, some magic thingy happens and stuff disappears or vanishes like it was put into a rocket ship and gets blasted up in the air, composed mostly of nitrogen, which gives the impression that it is blue.
ElChingon said:Yes, some people are putting it all on the line that running a team that professes doping is bad and they are clean, is the way to the promised land of gold and riches. Forget training and actually showing your face in a race, that's so "the doping years" kinda thing.
Spectacleur said:Doping is not (onley) related to money.
You"re right.9000ft said:True enough, it's also related to ego but I figured that was covered under "winning is everything"
IndianCyclist said:Doping will never die.
"The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues"
Ergo Clinic will never be closed.
However there are a some situations in which Clinic will implode
1) when >20% of the riders test positive
2) When LA begs for forgiveness
3) When one rider wins Giro tour Vuelta treble in single year
4) When one rider wins 5 monuments in single year
5) When all top riders test positive
6) when a superman undetectable drug is invented.
etc....
iZnoGouD said:you guys are just forcing stuff, are not open minded to see the whole picture, cycling is cleaner than ever, but all you see is dope dope dope
86TDFWinner said:Then why are you here & why keep posting here if you're so unhappy?
Race Radio said:Yeah, yeah, we get. We are all just a bunch of dumb hillbillies.