Question Pogacar vs Evenepoel - 200 KM FLAT ITT On Road Bikes

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Pogacar vs Evenepoel on a 200 KM Flat ITT Raced on Road Bikes: Who wins?


  • Total voters
    33
Definitely Remco.
0.5s/km in both. It's a decent gap – nothing special, but 2024 was the greatest form Pogacar (anyone?) has ever been and he'd trained a lot on the TT bike, probably more than Evenepoel given that Remco had other issues he was trying to fix.
Source? We have no idea how much time either of them spent on the TT bike. We just have anecdotal evidence that Pogacar did more last year because of the 2023 TdF TT. But Remco was also preparing for the Olympics, so I doubt he neglected his TT bike.
 
Remco's huge advantage over Pogacar is his flexibility in the TT position and his aerodynamic advantage as a whole.
On a road bike those advantages are greatly reduced. After a certain time and for a longer 4-5 hours effort (like a 200 KM Flat TT) Pogacar's bigger aerobic engine will prevail.
If anything Remco seems to be more aerobic and Pog relies on his anaerobic ability, because what keeps happening is that Pog does an attack which opens a gap and then settles into the same pace as Remco who is chasing behind.

I really don't buy that Pog intentionally maintains a certain margin of victory because I think he'd crush Remco by more if he could, to deal a mental blow (see lombardia 24).
 
  • Like
Reactions: veganrob
Remco for sure. Pogacar is just a better climber and has better endurance so he can be fresher in the end.
and he wins with those qualities. Remco lacks them for now and can mortgage his current talents to attempt to gain what it takes to win the Tour. Meanwhile; TP could become a TT specialist and train accordingly. Not sure what could be more boring.
If both their lives depended on doing a 200km pursuit on parallel tracks; who do you think would win? (This question posed to the author of this thread, not Peyro).
By the way; the pointlessness of an absolutely flat race on roads that don't exist misses every point about racing.
 
and he wins with those qualities. Remco lacks them for now and can mortgage his current talents to attempt to gain what it takes to win the Tour. Meanwhile; TP could become a TT specialist and train accordingly. Not sure what could be more boring.
If both their lives depended on doing a 200km pursuit on parallel tracks; who do you think would win? (This question posed to the author of this thread, not Peyro).
By the way; the pointlessness of an absolutely flat race on roads that don't exist misses every point about racing.
The 90 mile straight? Don't know how flat it is though.
 
I think Remco wins a pancake flat ITT. His personality/mentality seems better suited to this, outside of his aero position and physical ability.

I think Pog wins if they start together. Just them vs each other. Mano a mano on the road.
 
If anything Remco seems to be more aerobic and Pog relies on his anaerobic ability, because what keeps happening is that Pog does an attack which opens a gap and then settles into the same pace as Remco who is chasing behind.

I really don't buy that Pog intentionally maintains a certain margin of victory because I think he'd crush Remco by more if he could, to deal a mental blow (see lombardia 24).

It really depends on terrain. Pogacar has the best aerobic engine when it comes to uphill riding, he can simply achieve higher speed uphill and create gaps. Things change on flat/rolling terrain where Remco (due to his aerodynamics) has the best engine. Yesterday was a mix of both terrains and Pogacar prevailed.

When it comes to anaerobic ability Pogacar is superior which makes him more punchy/explosive during attacks or sprints but it doesn't help much on a 20-minute climb (except initial few dozens of seconds during his attack). Then his aerobic power is crucial.
 

TRENDING THREADS