That's they're own problem. Every person is responsible for himself.
probably true. But some teams might care enough,I really doubt the top riders are worrying about is own health.
The history says, riders don't care about they're own health.
That's they're own problem. Every person is responsible for himself.
probably true. But some teams might care enough,I really doubt the top riders are worrying about is own health.
The history says, riders don't care about they're own health.
Easily discovered by UCI mechanics. The below was in place ahead of the 2024 TdF.View: https://youtu.be/gaqBEUkXWtQ?si=jRlFDI1E4opCSX6d
"250 watts...good for 30 minutes." Looks like a normal racing bike, can't tell there's a hidden motor in there whatsoever.
After each stage, checks will be carried out on bikes ridden by:
- the stage winner,
- riders wearing a leader’s jersey (yellow, green, polka dot, white),
- several randomly-selected riders, and
- any rider who gives rise to suspicion, for example following the pre-stage control, or incidents picked up by the UCI Video Commissaire.
Three; one for each wheel and the crank.Guys I think I've cracked it:
Pogačar is using two motors
Plus two bionic ones they built into his legsThree; one for each wheel and the crank.
Who are these mechanics? Just above your quote (emphasis mine):Easily discovered by UCI mechanics. The below was in place ahead of the 2024 TdF.
No mention of taking apart the bikes. On the contrary. Multiple times they mention how they won't be laying their hands on the bikes - like they're proud of it or something.When it comes to the fight against technological fraud at the Tour de France, controls for the presence of any possible propulsion systems hidden in bikes will be carried out with the use of several non-intrusive tools available to the UCI such as magnetic tablets, and portable devices using backscatter and transmission technologies as well as image processing. In 2024, a new non-intrusive inspection tool will be added to the UCI's arsenal as part of the improvement of its detection programme using the latest technology. Further information on this subject will be communicated in due course after the 2024 Tour de France.
Everyone in the modern world not leaving on an asteroid knows that everyone on a paycheck does what he/she is told/paid to do. Thus UCI mechanics find what they are told/paid to find, cops catch whom they are paid/told to catch etc. Apologist folks know that too, but pretend to be ignorant...Who are these mechanics? Just above your quote (emphasis mine):
No mention of taking apart the bikes. On the contrary. Multiple times they mention how they won't be laying their hands on the bikes - like they're proud of it or something.
Note that this a decade-old tech. Not the very cutting edge as well. Still 250W for 30min totally undetectable (from the outside that is). One can easily extrapolate...View: https://youtu.be/gaqBEUkXWtQ?si=jRlFDI1E4opCSX6d
"250 watts...good for 30 minutes." Looks like a normal racing bike, can't tell there's a hidden motor in there whatsoever.
Pogi using e-bike is alternative facts.Everyone in the modern world not leaving on an asteroid knows that everyone on a paycheck does what he/she is told/paid to do. Thus UCI mechanics find what they are told/paid to find, cops catch whom they are paid/told to catch etc. Apologist folks know that too, but pretend to be ignorant...
"Alternative" with respect to the mainstream "narrative". Most definitely. As are many, many other facts corresponding to reality. That's the nature of ideology and propaganda. They would not have been what they are had much of the objective truth not been "alternative" to them.Pogi using e-bike is alternative facts.
And add to that the funny fact that the UCI leading "motor doping investigator" is the former UAE employee.The very fact that the UCI have introduced checks for motor doping means they think there’s good enough reason to take it somewhat seriously. Whether their countermeasures are good enough however must be in doubt. Further evidence that we have had a serious problem for years is the that there’s a copious amounts of rather suspicious looking footage now available. Bikes spinning under their own power across roads, back wheel furiously spinning. Bikes being picked up after a crash and wheels starting to spin of their own volition. Riders just pulling away from their colleagues at critical moments of the race, without any apparent effort, and in such a manner that just looks incredibly wrong. And now we have a guy winning everything or nearly everything, over a sustained period of years, by now winning every type of races with ridiculous ease, again just seemingly able to accelerate at will and sail away from a field of world class riders. Putting down an apparently ludicrous amount of power to effect a constant acceleration on steep hills or from up to a hundred kilometres from the finish line. Without any apparent additional effort, and not even breathing hard when he finishes. Yeah, right.
Yes, was posted here long ago. I'm not impressed and neither would be any court. We need to look at blood doping motors are a distraction.Anyone checked out this podcast? Apologies if someone has beaten me to it.
Ghost in the Machine
We might have a bigger problem than we think.
Please do share the source for that crystal ball you used to come to that conclusion. I certainly would like to have one. And other folks on this forum likely would not mind.Yes, was posted here long ago. I'm not impressed and neither would be any court. We need to look at blood doping motors are a distraction.
So why don't the trained UCI mechanics find motors in Pogacar's bike after it has been inspected many times? The UCI introduced motor checks after that woman MTBer was caught - being proactive as if motors got used it could destroy the entire sport. UCI introducing motor doping checks doesn't mean motor use is happening in the peloton.The very fact that the UCI have introduced checks for motor doping means they think there’s good enough reason to take it somewhat seriously. Whether their countermeasures are good enough however must be in doubt. Further evidence that we have had a serious problem for years is the that there’s a copious amounts of rather suspicious looking footage now available. Bikes spinning under their own power across roads, back wheel furiously spinning. Bikes being picked up after a crash and wheels starting to spin of their own volition. Riders just pulling away from their colleagues at critical moments of the race, without any apparent effort, and in such a manner that just looks incredibly wrong. And now we have a guy winning everything or nearly everything, over a sustained period of years, by now winning every type of races with ridiculous ease, again just seemingly able to accelerate at will and sail away from a field of world class riders. Putting down an apparently ludicrous amount of power to effect a constant acceleration on steep hills or from up to a hundred kilometres from the finish line. Without any apparent additional effort, and not even breathing hard when he finishes. Yeah, right.
Bikes spinning under their own power across roads, back wheel furiously spinning. Bikes being picked up after a crash and wheels starting to spin of their own volition
Yeah, no wonder you weren't convinced by Ghost in the Machine... She wasn't an MTB'er, but a CX'er - and also she was a junior, so a girl rather than a woman. And her getting caught didn't lead to "motor checks" (to the limited extend those word fit), she was caught on the very first day of motor checks being carried out. With some ridiculously simple and obvious motor, so the UCI have no track record of having ever caught an even slightly sophisticated motor.The UCI introduced motor checks after that woman MTBer was caught
Blood manipulation not motor doping. I think you are wasting your time.Yeah, no wonder you weren't convinced by Ghost in the Machine... She wasn't an MTB'er, but a CX'er - and also she was a junior, so a girl rather than a woman. And her getting caught didn't lead to "motor checks" (to the limited extend those word fit), she was caught on the very first day of motor checks being carried out. With some ridiculously simple and obvious motor, so the UCI have no track record of having ever caught an even slightly sophisticated motor.
One thing I do look forward to - with technology, something eventually always goes wrong (like very wrong). So, if motor doping is taking place, then at some point, something comical will likely be seen. Could you imagine some smoke, or the bike suddenly reversing the wheel direction?The very fact that the UCI have introduced checks for motor doping means they think there’s good enough reason to take it somewhat seriously. Whether their countermeasures are good enough however must be in doubt. Further evidence that we have had a serious problem for years is the that there’s a copious amounts of rather suspicious looking footage now available. Bikes spinning under their own power across roads, back wheel furiously spinning. Bikes being picked up after a crash and wheels starting to spin of their own volition. Riders just pulling away from their colleagues at critical moments of the race, without any apparent effort, and in such a manner that just looks incredibly wrong. And now we have a guy winning everything or nearly everything, over a sustained period of years, by now winning every type of races with ridiculous ease, again just seemingly able to accelerate at will and sail away from a field of world class riders. Putting down an apparently ludicrous amount of power to effect a constant acceleration on steep hills or from up to a hundred kilometres from the finish line. Without any apparent additional effort, and not even breathing hard when he finishes. Yeah, right.
Smoke will be easily "explained" by a short. Do not forget that modern bikes are already fully "legally" stuffed with battery-powered equipment: from shifters to transponders to god knows what else.One thing I do look forward to - with technology, something eventually always goes wrong (like very wrong). So, if motor doping is taking place, then at some point, something comical will likely be seen. Could you imagine some smoke, or the bike suddenly reversing the wheel direction?![]()
It's good that you at least use that qualifier "I think". What can I say? Sadly, this time around, you think wrong. The thing is the Muur de Huy seated searing attack that made all other world class hilly specialists look like "they were on their brakes" put all dots on i's even if those dots could be still considered missing (I think they were already there, for one).Blood manipulation not motor doping. I think you are wasting your time.
Blood manipulation not motor doping. I think you are wasting your time.
The ABP is ineffective at detecting very small amounts of blood transfusions. Anything on a larger scale will be detected by the system (the ABP is particularly sensitive to the re-infusion phase where Hct/Hgb increases and RET% decreases).The hidden motor conspiratorists would do much better to look into how the UCI passport is ineffective at detecting blood manipulation or is not being used to its full effect. I would think people here claiming to have PhD's (not you) would go down that path rather than Lee Harvey Oswald type conspiracy theories. With a PhD we should have enough thinking skills to work out how the passport could be circumvented. Might require reading some science papers though.