Robert5091 said:... otherwise they are just a boring team.
"Boring teams" tend to do well at GT's![]()
![]()
tobydawq said:Robert5091 said:... otherwise they are just a boring team.
"Boring teams" tend to do well at GT's![]()
![]()
Okay, not boring in the way ride, but boring in the sense that their riders aren't profiles at all. For example, I think of teams like Katusha and Trek as boring because most of their roster is just an indistinguishable mass of riders that almost never do anything of note for themselves, whereas Sky may ride boringly in GT's but I don't think of Froome, G, Kwiato, Moscon, Bernal, Poels etc. as boring riders and hence not of Sky as a boring team.
If that makes sense.
Beobachter said:Zinoviev Letter said:Mayomaniac said:Yes, he wants to ride the Vuelta as the team leader and go for top 5 on the gc.Laplaz said:Do you know why Buchmann is not selected for the Tour? Was it planned?
Glad to hear it.
I’m also glad to see Postlberger in the team. I was getting worried that he was having form problems or had fallen out with the team when he wasn’t in their main classics squad or at the Giro.
He did have form problems.
He was first sick and completely out of form for the classics, so the team and him decided him to fully skip the classics campaign to focus on his recovery for the Giro. But Pöstlberger, so eager to be ready for the Giro, was too optimistic and went back to racing too early, he had to abandon in Trentino. And it was clear he would never be able to compete in the Giro.
So, two huge disappointments for him. It is worth to notice that all these decisions have been taken in a common agreement between Pösti and the team. So, no worries, he had fallen out with the team: both were as sorry of the situation![]()
Pösti went back to racing again at the Dauphiné. This time, his form was very satisfying (cf the last stage especially) and all the health issues seem now to have been left behind. Which made him a very, very serious candidate for a Tour-spot!
Eventually, his problems earlier in the year have led him to be part of this TDF. If he had raced the Giro, he wouldn't have in the Tour.
Sending to the biggest race of the calendar a guy that originally wasn't supposed to be part of the squad for the race is a pretty good indication of how valued Pöstlberger is considered in the team![]()
(from a personal note, I expect all the Austrians to stay in the team in the future. I hope the selection of both Mühlberger and Pösti for the Tour is a sign in this way!)
I have to wonder what they're hoping to achieve though. I rate Zakarin, but I'm not sure he's a real GC winning contender. Kittel should be their star man, but they're supporting him with an inexperienced lead out man (one previous Tour) when he needs two top guys in the last kilometre.Eyeballs Out said:I see nothing much wrong with that team on paper. Haller's injury has hurt them but still no reason why they shouldn't get multiple stage wins and top 6 on GCtobydawq said:Katusha's squad:
Zakarin, Kittel, Zabel, Martin, Politt, Boswell, Kiserlovski, Kochetkov.
Absolutely lame.
I don't understand how it's van Baarle vs Bernal for the spot. If anything, I'd consider bringing Bernal instead of Poels. They're the pure climbers on the squad.Anderis said:Very strong all-around roster but actually not too many pure climbers. I wouldn't be shocked if they manage to isolate Froome quite early at one stage. And that's assuming he will be a contender, which is not sure after riding the Giro.b.broadhurst said:Looks like it’s Rowe not Bernal after all.
No Bernal in any training pictures.
Kwia, G, Poels, Rowe and Froome in Italy today. Moscon, Van Barrle and Castro at Nationals.
Van Baarle won Dutch TT today, the TTT could be a massacre plus with that lineup Sky could look to do some damage on the cobbles with 5 classics men dragging Froome.
Egan is in Andorra. Arrived from Colombia two or three days ago.b.broadhurst said:Looks like it’s Rowe not Bernal after all.
No Bernal in any training pictures.
Kwia, G, Poels, Rowe and Froome in Italy today. Moscon, Van Barrle and Castro at Nationals.
Van Baarle won Dutch TT today, the TTT could be a massacre plus with that lineup Sky could look to do some damage on the cobbles with 5 classics men dragging Froome.
Yup! Thanks.kiszol said:Logic-is-your-friend said:Ah, i was hoping for an overview with all profiles on one page, but this will have to do untill then. Thanks.Broccolidwarf said:Logic-is-your-friend said:Have the stage profiles been posted somewhere?
Yes, front page, click on the TDF link up top.... as well as on TDFs own HP
Something like this?
https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/tour-de-france/2018/stages/all-stage-profiles
It should just be Van Baarle instead of Rowe. No way they are suddenly picking Luke Rowe over Bernal after having Bernal skipping June-races and training specifically for the Tour instead - and the team will just overall be better since Moscon, Castro and Kwito very much can help with the rouleur duties. And even Thomas if they are in panic mode.Red Rick said:I don't understand how it's van Baarle vs Bernal for the spot. If anything, I'd consider bringing Bernal instead of Poels. They're the pure climbers on the squad.Anderis said:Very strong all-around roster but actually not too many pure climbers. I wouldn't be shocked if they manage to isolate Froome quite early at one stage. And that's assuming he will be a contender, which is not sure after riding the Giro.b.broadhurst said:Looks like it’s Rowe not Bernal after all.
No Bernal in any training pictures.
Kwia, G, Poels, Rowe and Froome in Italy today. Moscon, Van Barrle and Castro at Nationals.
Van Baarle won Dutch TT today, the TTT could be a massacre plus with that lineup Sky could look to do some damage on the cobbles with 5 classics men dragging Froome.
Bolder said:Was looking at preview article on CN and thinking that it really could come down to the ITT at the end. I could see Froome and Dumoulin racing conservatively in the mountains, just trying to stay within 2 minutes of the other GCers, and hoping for a blowout time trial. I think I like those odds if I'm either one of them, knowing I've spent a lot of energy already in the Giro.
brownbobby said:Bolder said:Was looking at preview article on CN and thinking that it really could come down to the ITT at the end. I could see Froome and Dumoulin racing conservatively in the mountains, just trying to stay within 2 minutes of the other GCers, and hoping for a blowout time trial. I think I like those odds if I'm either one of them, knowing I've spent a lot of energy already in the Giro.
Maybe, or maybe it goes the other way....both Froome and Dumoulin are going to have 2 full GT's in the legs by the time the ITT comes around. Could be a bit of a risky strategy to rely on having enough left in the tank at that point to make up significant time.
Sky seem to have been paying more attention than ever to the TTT this year, so i'd bet on the opposite strategy, they try and give Froome as big a lead as possible from the early TTT, and then hope his form holds long enough to maintain any lead he's got...
I agree with this. Relying on the final TT might be too risky. He could be very tired by then.brownbobby said:Bolder said:Was looking at preview article on CN and thinking that it really could come down to the ITT at the end. I could see Froome and Dumoulin racing conservatively in the mountains, just trying to stay within 2 minutes of the other GCers, and hoping for a blowout time trial. I think I like those odds if I'm either one of them, knowing I've spent a lot of energy already in the Giro.
Maybe, or maybe it goes the other way....both Froome and Dumoulin are going to have 2 full GT's in the legs by the time the ITT comes around. Could be a bit of a risky strategy to rely on having enough left in the tank at that point to make up significant time.
Sky seem to have been paying more attention than ever to the TTT this year, so i'd bet on the opposite strategy, they try and give Froome as big a lead as possible from the early TTT, and then hope his form holds long enough to maintain any lead he's got...
Jonathan Vaughters says: “Dani Martinez was just off the win in Tour of California last month. I would put him on par, people might argue with me, in terms of talent coming out of the young Colombian ranks with Egan Bernal (Team Sky).
Tim Booth said:
exactly, that's pretty much why Astana put Rast instead of Horner on board in the 2009 Tour. Having a rolleur with 0000 ambitions never hurts. Rowe will be guaranteed to do lots of dirty work early in the stages while how effective bernal will be is unknown.spalco said:It seems to me like teams are putting significant weight on the first week in their team selection. Generally I think when in doubt taking a rouleur instead of a climbing domestique is rarely a mistake anyway.
I would like to see Bernal in the Tour, but does it really matter when he has no freedom?
Yeah...dacooley said:exactly, that's pretty much why Astana put Rast instead of Horner on board in the 2009 Tour. Having a rolleur with 0000 ambitions never hurts. Rowe will be guaranteed to do lots of dirty work early in the stages while how effective bernal will be is unknown.spalco said:It seems to me like teams are putting significant weight on the first week in their team selection. Generally I think when in doubt taking a rouleur instead of a climbing domestique is rarely a mistake anyway.
I would like to see Bernal in the Tour, but does it really matter when he has no freedom?