I rate van Baarle as a better climber than Rowe. He used to be pretty decent at the hilly stuff in the U23's. But yeah, whatever Sky decide you will always leave out someone good
rick james said:Aye but sky will be lacking really top end climbers
rick james said:Aye but sky will be lacking really top end climbers
RedheadDane said:Martinez is a pretty good rider, so I see nothing unusual about him being selected.
I also don't see anything unusual about Breschel not being selected, it was merely a comment on how Danish media reacted when Bak (somewhat surprisingly) and Mørkøv (not at all surprisingly) were also not selected.
Both Sky and Bernal will benefit more from him racing the Vuelta, where he will probably share leadership (unless Froome and Sky truly do hate the sport). A classics rouleur like Rowe will balance the team far better and offers a chance to win the pavé stage if he doesn’t have to babysit Froome.dacooley said:exactly, that's pretty much why Astana put Rast instead of Horner on board in the 2009 Tour. Having a rolleur with 0000 ambitions never hurts. Rowe will be guaranteed to do lots of dirty work early in the stages while how effective bernal will be is unknown.spalco said:It seems to me like teams are putting significant weight on the first week in their team selection. Generally I think when in doubt taking a rouleur instead of a climbing domestique is rarely a mistake anyway.
I would like to see Bernal in the Tour, but does it really matter when he has no freedom?
42x16ss said:Both Sky and Bernal will benefit more from him racing the Vuelta, where he will probably share leadership (unless Froome and Sky truly do hate the sport). A classics rouleur like Rowe will balance the team far better and offers a chance to win the pavé stage if he doesn’t have to babysit Froome.dacooley said:exactly, that's pretty much why Astana put Rast instead of Horner on board in the 2009 Tour. Having a rolleur with 0000 ambitions never hurts. Rowe will be guaranteed to do lots of dirty work early in the stages while how effective bernal will be is unknown.spalco said:It seems to me like teams are putting significant weight on the first week in their team selection. Generally I think when in doubt taking a rouleur instead of a climbing domestique is rarely a mistake anyway.
I would like to see Bernal in the Tour, but does it really matter when he has no freedom?
Lol no. Very little to no chance for G or Poels to win the Tour if something happens to Froome.Son of Amsterhammer said:Sky have so many options. It’s ridiculous. Honestly, even if something happens to Froome, they’d still have a decent shot at yellow with G, or even Poels.
I think riders no longer wear national champion TT kits in TTTs?b.broadhurst said:Sky are going to look awesome in the TTT.
G, Bernal, Castro and Van Baarle in national kits and possibly Moscon if he retains.
Only Froome, Kwia and Poels without jerseys.
Zinoviev Letter said:Both Rowe and Van Baarle are more than capable of doing the job Sky asks of them and neither will be doing anything other than that job, so it really doesn’t matter at all. Whether they take both or one plus Bernal matters because that changes the structure of the team.
I rate Van Baarle as just an overall better rider than Rowe on cobbles, TT, climbs etc., but Rowe has tried it before and Froomey is probably more comfortable with him. Van Baarle must be gutted.Dekker_Tifosi said:I rate van Baarle as a better climber than Rowe. He used to be pretty decent at the hilly stuff in the U23's. But yeah, whatever Sky decide you will always leave out someone good
RedheadDane said:Martinez is a pretty good rider, so I see nothing unusual about him being selected.
I also don't see anything unusual about Breschel not being selected, it was merely a comment on how Danish media reacted when Bak (somewhat surprisingly) and Mørkøv (not at all surprisingly) were also not selected.
Nice, could easily end up in controversy on stage 9 where Thomas most likely wont wait on Froome.Rollthedice said:
Valv.Piti said:I rate Van Baarle as just an overall better rider than Rowe on cobbles, TT, climbs etc., but Rowe has tried it before and Froomey is probably more comfortable with him. Van Baarle must be gutted.Dekker_Tifosi said:I rate van Baarle as a better climber than Rowe. He used to be pretty decent at the hilly stuff in the U23's. But yeah, whatever Sky decide you will always leave out someone good
Rollthedice said:
How is it unfair?Dekker_Tifosi said:Valv.Piti said:I rate Van Baarle as just an overall better rider than Rowe on cobbles, TT, climbs etc., but Rowe has tried it before and Froomey is probably more comfortable with him. Van Baarle must be gutted.Dekker_Tifosi said:I rate van Baarle as a better climber than Rowe. He used to be pretty decent at the hilly stuff in the U23's. But yeah, whatever Sky decide you will always leave out someone good
Rowe is British. Should have known.
Unfair decision though
Sky will organise a special BBQ for Thomas on the rest dayValv.Piti said:Nice, could easily end up in controversy on stage 9 where Thomas most likely wont wait on Froome.Rollthedice said: