Re: Re:
vedrafjord said:
In the line before it I pointed out that the number of flat ITT kilometres in GTs has dropped dramatically over the last 30 years. In the relative absence of ITTs the only opportunities for lightweight climbers to lose time are cobbles and crosswinds, and most GTs don't feature much of either (crosswinds arguably cost Quintana victory in 2015).
The decline of ITT miles is absolutely correct, but in the past Fleaweights lost most time in the mountains due to not having the resilience of stronger riders.
Hinault who won most (sometimes all) TT's in a TdF actually gained most time in the mountains, even though he seldom won a mountainstage. For example Winnen lost almost double the time in the mountains than in the ITT (1982), which is eyepopping considering he was among the best climbers and a terrible TT rider. And the best pure climber in 1982 (Breu, 2 stage wins) got absolutely crushed on the longer mountain stages.
More obvious are Fignon and Lemond who dominated the TT's and simultanuously slam dunked all climbers (they won multiple mountainstages between each other). And this was in the Postobon heighdays.
Even if we scratch all TT miles, I sincerely doubt the true small fleaweights will win. It will be the 175-185 riders. And yup there's physiology (relatively heavy organs) and bike weight in play there. Quintana is really an odd one in this respect. Somehow he managed to compensate that gap enough to win GT's... rather unique. Even Herrera struggled in the GC (one GT win for that talent).