Sandisfan said:
Proposed tour:
As an imaginary billionaire, 10's of billions, I propose a new 3 week Grand Tour which would be held every two years bi-annual.
SHORTEND
P.S.S. One advantage of this Tour is that it would run in prime-time in most of Europe.
Obviously as you say this would be a very unlikely one to ever be able to happen (and one that I and many others who are quite traditionalist would naturally oppose if a real such event was mooted) but in terms of showcasing what the US has to offer this could be a very entertaining concept. After all, back in the "Open" days there were a number of races that lasted longer than we ever find on the current calendar, two week races like the Coors Classic used to be, the Milk Race, the Peace Race, the Volta a Portugal got up to 19 stages at one point, and so on.
In terms of having the skills to make a race design, most of us are using
http://www.cronoescalada.com at the moment, but there are a few other sites you can use, such as
http://www.openrunner.com and
http://www.mapmyride.com. Tracks4bikers used to be the best but it has been destroyed by google's maps changes I'm afraid. These types of sites will give you plenty of scope to draw up your designs, play about with them and produce the profiles that you find all over these threads. Openrunner will give you a more detailed profile but Cronoescalada gives you the ones in TDF/Giro/Vuelta format.
I'd say that the problem a GT in the US would always suffer from is that the territory is significantly larger than any of the countries that host genuine GTs or areas that have hosted those longer races in the past or present (2 week Vuelta a Colombia, Peace Race, Colorado, Portugal) and so there would always be huge parts of the country which were unused. As a result, if they were to do some kind of rota to ensure everybody got a chance to see the race, you could end up with some amazing editions where all the states involved were the ones with the exciting terrain, and other editions that would be like a three week version of the old Tour of Missouri, which was an execrable race. If there were to be a complete focus on one area (such as 11 days in California each time as you suggest), other areas may get fed up of only seeing the race very rarely while one state gets all the best action, not to mention that presumably this would supplant the existing Tour of California? At the same time, there's just SO much more to California than the real race uses that you could probably spend a whole three week race there, though touring a part of a country for three weeks would always struggle to be accepted as a "Grand Tour" per se.
Touring places as far afield as Peru and Colombia would be a serious headache, but Mexico and western Canada could be great places to get the race started. I know the Giro starts in the Netherlands and Denmark are some way from Italy but the distances between countries in Europe are much less, which I think would limit the amount of experimentation that would be feasible. Even Hawaii could be a problem, but I know that could create some totally crazy options (remembering Progsprach's Mauna Kea descent ITT, possibly the most sadistic stage ever posted in this thread, which puts it against a LOT of competition!!!). But then, as you say, the race is not intended as something that you realistically expect could or would happen, therefore you needn't be bounded by that. I look forward to seeing what you come up with