@Visko
I really like your route. If there is one problem I think it's that the route is maybe a bit backloaded. Your biggest mountain stages are stages 14, 19 and 20 while your medium mountain stages are the stages 3, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15 and 17. Besides that there are two medium length ITT's on stages 6 and 13 and another very hard mtf on stage 5. That means that although you have 7 medium mountain stages only two come after stage 13 and 14 (one of the 2 hardest mountain stages and one of the two ITT's) and the 5 other ones might be wasted since maybe nobody has to attack before stage 13 and 14. Moreover stages 19 and 20 are probably the 2nd and 3rd hardest stages so there is a possibility that all climbers are still not too far behind and will completely save themselves for these two stages. I would therefore prefer it if some of the medium mountain stages would come later. Especially stages 8, 9 and 11 have a great profile but might not lead to action that early.
However these really are no big problems. More likely the first ITT and the first mtf will already cause some big time gaps anyway and there would be at least some action on the medium mountain stages (especially on the ones with an uphill finish)
Oh and actually I just noticed another big problem, the 40 km TTT on stage one. I generally dislike TTT's but I think especially in a route with a lot of hilly terrain and a crosswind stage (btw, I really like that stage) teams will already need enough good rolleurs so I think a TTT, especially at that length, is unnecessary.
Nevertheless awesome route.
I really like your route. If there is one problem I think it's that the route is maybe a bit backloaded. Your biggest mountain stages are stages 14, 19 and 20 while your medium mountain stages are the stages 3, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15 and 17. Besides that there are two medium length ITT's on stages 6 and 13 and another very hard mtf on stage 5. That means that although you have 7 medium mountain stages only two come after stage 13 and 14 (one of the 2 hardest mountain stages and one of the two ITT's) and the 5 other ones might be wasted since maybe nobody has to attack before stage 13 and 14. Moreover stages 19 and 20 are probably the 2nd and 3rd hardest stages so there is a possibility that all climbers are still not too far behind and will completely save themselves for these two stages. I would therefore prefer it if some of the medium mountain stages would come later. Especially stages 8, 9 and 11 have a great profile but might not lead to action that early.
However these really are no big problems. More likely the first ITT and the first mtf will already cause some big time gaps anyway and there would be at least some action on the medium mountain stages (especially on the ones with an uphill finish)
Oh and actually I just noticed another big problem, the 40 km TTT on stage one. I generally dislike TTT's but I think especially in a route with a lot of hilly terrain and a crosswind stage (btw, I really like that stage) teams will already need enough good rolleurs so I think a TTT, especially at that length, is unnecessary.
Nevertheless awesome route.