@rghysens, do you still have the track of this race? I'm exploring good Grand Depart options in the area from Lyon to Germany and found your race most interesting.OK, I lied when I said my next design would be a Dauphiné Libéré.
When I was designing my Tour Complet de France, I was looking for hilly regions in the northern half of France I could use to spice up the first week of it. There's of course the Ardennes and Vosges we all know, and I made use of the Vosges. But when I was examining the regions between the Vosges and the center of France, I stumbled upon a nice hilly region between Dijon and Montbard.
I didn't include it in my Tour, because I already had enough hard stages, but I thought this area would fit well as the focal point of a hilly one day race. So, I designed one. Since the race takes place in the departement Côte d'Or, I named it GP Côte d'Or, out of lack of inspiration. It will be a 230km long "semi-classic", a bit like the GP Ouest France in Plouay (length-wise, it is much harder). The difficulty of the hills is somewhere in between those of the AGR and LBL.
The race starts in Beaune, the so-called capital of Burgundy wines. Then in a more or less straight line to Semur-en-Auxois, where the finishline is crossed for a first time after 75km. The race continues north, going through Montbard and passing the abbaye de Fontenay.
After 128km the first climb makes its appearance and in a span of 90km 12 more wil follow.
The last 15km or so will be easier again, just like LBL untill the very early 1990's. The punchy climbers, if they want to take advantage of the possibilities they are offered, should attack from far enough, and they can completely obliterate the field.
GP Côte d'Or: Beaune - Semur-en-Auxois: 232km
Map:

Profile:

Climbs:
Côte de Pouillenay: km130; 2km @ 5.6%
Côte de Hauteroche: km139.5; 1.5km @ 8.3%
Côte de Tour Marmont: km143.5; 1.7km @ 9.4%
Côte de Corpoyer les Moines: km147; 1.3km @ 9.1%
Côte de Frôlois: km152; 2.4km @ 5.8%
Côte de Thenissey: km157.5; 2.8km @ 5.8%
Côte de Jailly-les-Moulins: km166; 2.4km @ 5.6%
Côte de Verrey-sous-Salmaise: km177; 3km @ 4.8%
Côte de Ville-en-Auxois: km181; 1.3km @ 10.5%
Côte de Saint-Hélier: km188.5; 1.5km @ 7.7%
Côte d'Avosnes: km194; 0.9km @ 10.7%
Côte de Posanges: km209; 1.2km @ 9.5%
Côte d'Arnay-sous-Vitteaux: km218; 1.8km @ 6.8%
*when Vielha last hosted a stage start.This pattern continued in 2016 in the Tour de France, when Pla de Beret last hosted a mountaintop finish;
I looked for it on the older tracing tools I used, but didnn't find it. It's basically the area between Montbard and Sombernon. There are three more or less parallel roads D9, D10 and D905 that run in valleys, separated by steep hill ridges. Whatever road you take perpendicular to the aforementioned main roads will be a steep wall.@rghysens, do you still have the track of this race? I'm exploring good Grand Depart options in the area from Lyon to Germany and found your race most interesting.
Port de Cabus could be another crossing in the future, but I don't think it's likely.Well, there is a third road, but accessing it from Os de Civís in a race is almost certainly never going to happen since that Spanish village is only accessible by road from Andorra anyway (the other side is unpaved and a long way from being passable) and the population is barely 100, so, yea.
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Cronoescalada is now pretty decent in China, because OSM is much more reliable than Google there. It's more reliable in the more populated areas. It can be a bit obsolete though with many superprojects and infrastructural development work going on. Pleko and google fu might be required for areas of lower population density.Maybe a bit of an odd question, but does anyone here know how accurate Cronoescalada is when it comes to roads being paved outside of Europe, specifically in China?
Thanks for the info. I've been messing around with Yunnan as a region a bit, there's some serious altitude and long climbs there.Cronoescalada is now pretty decent in China, because OSM is much more reliable than Google there. It's more reliable in the more populated areas. It can be a bit obsolete though with many superprojects and infrastructural development work going on. Pleko and google fu might be required for areas of lower population density.
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		
 
				
		