Race Radio, anti-RR, Polish and Twitter Campaigns

[thehog]

Interestingly a friend of mine from another forum got into it with anti-LA people on that forum and within 12 hours his boss was receiving emails trying to get him fired.

Like I said before, the extremes on both sides are out of hand.

Friend of mine is having some problems with his d1ck. Like its really itchy and has spots. What do you think he should do? Just so I can let him know. Like he really needs to know and I can tell him.

 

[patricknd]

Friend of mine is having some problems with his d1ck. Like its really itchy and has spots. What do you think he should do? Just so I can let him know. Like he really needs to know and I can tell him.

he should take it out of your mouth.

 

[JMBeaushrimp]

he should take it out of your mouth.

LMFAO! That was good...

 

[Hugh Januss]

Interestingly a friend of mine from another forum got into it with anti-LA people on that forum and within 12 hours his boss was receiving emails trying to get him fired.

Like I said before, the extremes on both sides are out of hand.

I think I'm gonna have to call bullshit on this one.

 

[D-Queued]

Interestingly a friend of mine from another forum got into it with anti-LA people on that forum and within 12 hours his boss was receiving emails trying to get him fired.

Like I said before, the extremes on both sides are out of hand.

I think I'm gonna have to call bullshit on this one.

Perhaps some poetic license is being applied here.

Ed Coyle, or a fan thereof? Wouldn't said fan have been self-employed?

Alternately, perhaps the supervisor of a drunken mice friend of Floyd's found out what he was doing all day on the University's research computers.

Otherwise, perhaps Hampsten88 you could provide a bit more detail here to make the allegation believable.

Dave.

 

[Benotti69]

Perhaps some poetic license is being applied here.

Ed Coyle, or a fan thereof? Wouldn't said fan have been self-employed?

Alternately, perhaps the supervisor of a drunken mice friend of Floyd's found out what he was doing all day on the University's research computers.

Otherwise, perhaps Hampsten88 you could provide a bit more detail here to make the allegation believable.

Dave.

i seriously doubt any of those on here who have been called 'haters' by LA fanboys have contacted fanboys places of work to try and get people dismissed from their employment, so as Hugh says BS.

All part of the new muddy the water attempt by saying those who think LA should be investigated for doping and his 'co called charity' are as fundamental as his fanboys.

 

[red_flanders]

I'll just try again:

You can even form opinions by just asking/sending questions.
And it's not hard to find out, where these come from.
I know, hard to accept and too complex for some people.

So LS-reaction is understandable and some guys around here seem to be joking when they describe themselfes as serious and objective.

Even easier to form opinion by answering questions.

Easier still to form opinion by pointedly not answering questions and going on a smear campaign against someone who 99.999999999% of people who know of Livestrong have never heard of.

The questions are in my view completely serious. They are not neutral, but they are objective.

 

[jimmypop]

Perhaps some poetic license is being applied here.

Ed Coyle, or a fan thereof? Wouldn't said fan have been self-employed?

Alternately, perhaps the supervisor of a drunken mice friend of Floyd's found out what he was doing all day on the University's research computers

I think you're spot on with this "guess".

 

[Hampsten88]

There we have the hypocritical nature of the LA debate. If it's alleged that a pro-LA person has done something you guys buy the story 100% and rant on against those evil people. If it's alleged that an anti-LA person did something then you guys claim it's BS and demand proof.

Both extremes in this debate are bad, but the one who seems to be the most hypocritical is the anti-LA crowd, but perhaps it seems that way simply because they are the most vocal.

By the way, I have actually seen the offending emails and they are very real...not that those who try to make the anti-LA crowd out to be wonderful people who can do and say no wrong will believe it.

 

[Hugh Januss]

There we have the hypocritical nature of the LA debate. If it's alleged that a pro-LA person has done something you guys buy the story 100% and rant on against those evil people. If it's alleged that an anti-LA person did something then you guys claim it's BS and demand proof.

Both extremes in this debate are bad, but the one who seems to be the most hypocritical is the anti-LA crowd, but perhaps it seems that way simply because they are the most vocal.

By the way, I have actually seen the offending emails and they are very real...not that those who try to make the anti-LA crowd out to be wonderful people who can do and say no wrong will believe it.

So, did you lose your job, fanboy?

 

[Barrus]

There we have the hypocritical nature of the LA debate. If it's alleged that a pro-LA person has done something you guys buy the story 100% and rant on against those evil people. If it's alleged that an anti-LA person did something then you guys claim it's BS and demand proof.

Both extremes in this debate are bad, but the one who seems to be the most hypocritical is the anti-LA crowd, but perhaps it seems that way simply because they are the most vocal.

By the way, I have actually seen the offending emails and they are very real...not that those who try to make the anti-LA crowd out to be wonderful people who can do and say no wrong will believe it.

We believe it sooner because we know TFF

 

[skippythepinhead]

In what world can your love of Lance Armstrong get you fired by people who want to see him strung up by his ball?

I'm sure you can hear my laughter wherever you are. Can you get one of your personalities to dredge up something akin to evidence?

 

[Race Radio]

We believe it sooner because we know TFF

If TFF wrote some emails I really hope he shares them with us.

 

[peloton]

By the way, I have actually seen the offending emails and they are very real...not that those who try to make the anti-LA crowd out to be wonderful people who can do and say no wrong will believe it.

Which cycling (?) forum were you referring to?

 

[Benotti69]

Both extremes in this debate are bad, but the one who seems to be the most hypocritical is the anti-LA crowd, but perhaps it seems that way simply because they are the most vocal.

.

What absolute Bull crap.

there is only extremity on one side here as has been proven by the treatment of RaceRadio on twitter and TFF in contact made to his university.

Now if some one who posts about the doping of Gunderson and fraud by his so called charity attempted to do the same idiotic fundamentalist actions the fanboys would be on here in their droves (or should that be drones) screaming about it. To date Zilch.

It doesn't take the cult long to out themselves does it?

 

[Barrus]

If TFF wrote some emails I really hope he shares them with us.

Yup, if it was TFF who did this I would be rolling around laughing because he nothing he would've written would've been serious and he probably would have choosen some quite hilarious sentences.

Also if what Hampsten states is real and did occur on this forum, let the member to whom this happened come forward through pm with one of the mods, or through e-mail with some of the staff, because if this is true it will be taken serious. Although I doubt this happened here and actually doubt the entire truthfulness of the story

 

[Race Radio]

Yup, if it was TFF who did this I would be rolling around laughing because he nothing he would've written would've been serious and he probably would have choosen some quite hilarious sentences.

Also if what Hampsten states is real and did occur on this forum, let the member to whom this happened come forward through pm with one of the mods, or through e-mail with some of the staff, because if this is true it will be taken serious. Although I doubt this happened here and actually doubt the entire truthfulness of the story

This is the key difference I see. Both sides have their crazy people, but I have to see anything remotely resembling comedy from the groupies.....just crazy

 

[Polish]

Now if some one who posts about the doping of Gunderson and fraud by his so called charity attempted to do the same idiotic fundamentalist actions the fanboys would be on here in their droves (or should that be drones) screaming about it. To date Zilch.

I disagree.

I think the haters complain a lot more than the fanboys.
At least on this forum. (the only one I post on btw)

Maybe we can ask the MODS "who complains more"?
waawaa

 

[Benotti69]

I disagree.

they are only haters to cultfanboyfundamentalists like you and others who still haven't smelled the coffee

to the rest they are posters discussing one of the worst cheats in the history of the sport who also happens to be a bully, a sociopath and a fraud.

 

[Hampsten88]

Yup, if it was TFF who did this I would be rolling around laughing because he nothing he would've written would've been serious and he probably would have choosen some quite hilarious sentences.

Also if what Hampsten states is real and did occur on this forum, let the member to whom this happened come forward through pm with one of the mods, or through e-mail with some of the staff, because if this is true it will be taken serious. Although I doubt this happened here and actually doubt the entire truthfulness of the story

In my initial post I said "...a friend of mine from another forum got into it with anti-LA people on that forum..." so clearly it did not occur here. I have no idea what was done at that forum, I just know what had been sent to my friends boss.

You and others can doubt the story as much as you want, but the most telling thing to me is how this part of my last post has been conveniently ignored by the anti-LA crowd here...and proven as being true:

There we have the hypocritical nature of the LA debate. If it's alleged that a pro-LA person has done something you guys buy the story 100% and rant on against those evil people. If it's alleged that an anti-LA person did something then you guys claim it's BS and demand proof.

 

[Race Radio]

In my initial post I said "...a friend of mine from another forum got into it with anti-LA people on that forum..." so clearly it did not occur here. I have no idea what was done at that forum, I just know what had been sent to my friends boss.

You and others can doubt the story as much as you want, but the most telling thing to me is how this part of my last post has been conveniently ignored by the anti-LA crowd here...and proven as being true:

There we have the hypocritical nature of the LA debate. If it's alleged that a pro-LA person has done something you guys buy the story 100% and rant on against those evil people. If it's alleged that an anti-LA person did something then you guys claim it's BS and demand proof.

Got a link? Or did you just invent this and your imaginary friend who lost his job?

 

[Digger]

In my initial post I said "...a friend of mine from another forum got into it with anti-LA people on that forum..." so clearly it did not occur here. I have no idea what was done at that forum, I just know what had been sent to my friends boss.

You and others can doubt the story as much as you want, but the most telling thing to me is how this part of my last post has been conveniently ignored by the anti-LA crowd here...and proven as being true:

There we have the hypocritical nature of the LA debate. If it's alleged that a pro-LA person has done something you guys buy the story 100% and rant on against those evil people. If it's alleged that an anti-LA person did something then you guys claim it's BS and demand proof.

Are yuo ever going to post anything substantive around doping, seen as you're in the clinic? Or are you going to go on and on and on about hypocrites?

 

[Barrus]

There we have the hypocritical nature of the LA debate. If it's alleged that a pro-LA person has done something you guys buy the story 100% and rant on against those evil people. If it's alleged that an anti-LA person did something then you guys claim it's BS and demand proof.

Again what you state that a pro-LA person had done, we know from first hand experience through seeing the tweets and because we know TFF, the victim of this. In the case of the anti-LA person doing anything, we know nothing and nobody in this story

 

[pedaling squares]

... the most telling thing to me is how this part of my last post has been conveniently ignored by the anti-LA crowd here...and proven as being true:

There we have the hypocritical nature of the LA debate. If it's alleged that a pro-LA person has done something you guys buy the story 100% and rant on against those evil people. If it's alleged that an anti-LA person did something then you guys claim it's BS and demand proof.

It strikes me that you consider everything you write to be true simply because you have written it. Those who disagree are either wrong or lack courage. There is room for debate H88.

 

[Benotti69]

Got a link? Or did you just invent this and your imaginary friend who lost his job?

If he worked for my company and belonged to a cult that had a sociopathic cheater as its leader and running fraudulent charity i think i'd sacked them too.