Re: Re:
Where do you rate Gilbert?
Logic-is-your-friend said:Not the level per se, but the competition is much larger. It's become a global sport, something that still wasn't the case in the 70s. I still stand by my ranking (page 2 or 3). I also rate Boonen higher than Museeuw.Flamin said:rghysens said:Pennino said:rghysens said:Belgium:
(The most difficult was to judge the palmares of Philippe Thys.)
1) Eddy Merckx
2) Rik Van Looy
3) Philippe Thys
4) Roger De Vlaeminck
5) Freddy Maertens
I guess Tom Boonen would be sixth? Quite surprising not to see him here.
Definitely not. For 5th and 6th I doubted between Maertens and Van Steenbergen. So Van Steenbergen (3x wc, 1x msr, 2x rvv, 1x p-r, 2x FW,...) is 6th. I also rate Museeuw and Schotte higher than Boonen. Then there are guys like Sylvere Maes and Lucien Buysse who both won the Tour twice (but not much else), Germain Derycke and Walter Godefroot who lack the world title but were certainly no worse one day racers than Boonen (in an era with more competition). So, in my opinion Boonen hovers around somewhere in the lower parts of the top10.
I don't get how people keep saying this. The level today is 1000 times higher.
Where do you rate Gilbert?