brianf7 said:
Statute of limitations is 6 years in most cases but when was the original case started is he appealing something from that.
It wont be CAS dealing with the matter
Rasmussen's services were terminated by Rabobank in July 2007.
Presumably he took breach of contract action against Rabobank thereafter and in July 2008 he claims to have won in litigation but only to the extent of 715,000 and not $1.1m euros.
His rights to challenge the decision, by appeal or "slip rule" (if it exists), is limited by the rules or legislation relating to that court. In my neck of the woods it is 21-28 days depending on the level of court.
Any other grievance that he has against Rabobank other than what he claims is due under his contract is limited to be commenced within the local statute of limitations period after he became aware of the circumstances giving rise to his claim for damages. He is within time if it is 6 years.
On his original claim under breach of contract that ship would have sailed if the limited time to act has expired.
The only exception could be if the judgment was obtained by fraud.
Rupert Murdoch has a legitimate future claim against LA if the settlement between LA and
The Times was obtained by fraud. The UK law views a court stamped settlement between the parties as a judgment.
But at the moment and into the future Mr. Murdoch would have more pressing issues to deal with than a comparatively immaterial settlement.