Don't understand all the hate toward the 2013 course. Sure it is not a perfect course but I think some need to put things in perspective instead of just hating on ASO. When I read some of the comments, I think some here just bash ASO for fun. I mean how can you blame ASO for making a flat stage up to the Ventoux, there are no mountains in the vicinity, it is geographical fact. Short of building a mountain, there is nothing ASO can do about it (actually they did all they could do by adding length to the stage to make it harder but that only prompts people to blame them for putting useless flat at the beginning of the stage). Also, the Tour is much bigger than any other race and can not go to some places (because of logistics) that races like the Giro can go (after all the 2012 Vuelta with its legion of MTF was hosted by ASO so you can not blame them for not trying to include mountains). Also they need big cities that apply to host stages for each stage and while they get a number of applications it still greatly reduces their options (they always finish in Pau after 50kms of flat not for fun but because it is the only city big enough in the region to host the finish of the stage), they don't make crappy stages on purpose.
That being said, and even though the course is well balanced (not many ITTs but in modern cycling it is much easier to create gaps in ITT than on MTF for the TDF GC contenders), I don't agree with every choice they made (for example : Corsica will be much harder than most expect because it is very narrow roads and up and down but it could have been even better). Some stages I really look forward to (Paris at Sunset, Le Grand Bornand, Mont Saint-Michel (at least for the scenery), Ventoux, Ax 3 Domaines and I don't mind Semnoz too much (those short mountain stages have been the most entertaining these last year, and let's not fool ourselves, have the advantage for TVs that ETA are much more precise (because they spend so 'little' time in the saddle)).