It will be hard to get a Tour better than 2012.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Worst Tour in the last 20+ years.It will be hard to get a Tour better than 2012.
Things which are criticized without fail, every year, to the point it's usually not worth responding:How can anyone rate 1-3 this Tour? I am not saying this Tour was incredible but they really think this was close to the level of 2012 Giro or 2012 Tour? This Tour was way better than 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014. In the last 10 years, only 2 Tours were better...
There is no course that someone, usually many someones, won’t complain about. I’m not saying it’s not a topic for discussion, I’m saying that the level of moaning about tactics, course design, and the race overall is way overdone, and often fairly detached from a realistic view of what the teams, riders, or course designers really are trying to accomplish.Think course and stage design is very much worth discussing/responding to or whatever. Commentators say riders make the race, but fail to also say that the riders cannot make the race without a route to do it on. So it should be the route designer's main objective to actually give the riders reasons to race and a proper course to do that one so they at least can say "well, we did that we had to do, the riders didn't". ASO has been quite successfull lately, but them moaning about boring flat stages mostly falls back on themselves in this year's TdF. People pointed that out quite early, so it was really was not to the surprise of many in here that it panned out the way it did.
Rest of the route was no problem as was evidenced.
The problem, as I see it, is the insistence on sprint stages. If you want big strong riders to push 1500 watts in a bunch sprint, then you just can't have a hard, hilly or "interesting" stage before that. The two are incompatible. Either you say, OK Dylan Groenewegen, we don't have a place for you anymore and someone like Ghirmay is now the minimum climbing level allowed; or you go for kermesse stages to at least give the fans something to see besides a quiet toodle for 150 km. Ofc echelons/crosswinds are something else but that is largely unpredictable until the day of. ,Think course and stage design is very much worth discussing/responding to or whatever. Commentators say riders make the race, but fail to also say that the riders cannot make the race without a route to do it on. So it should be the route designer's main objective to actually give the riders reasons to race and a proper course to do that one so they at least can say "well, we did that we had to do, the riders didn't". ASO has been quite successfull lately, but them moaning about boring flat stages mostly falls back on themselves in this year's TdF. People pointed that out quite early, so it was really was not to the surprise of many in here that it panned out the way it did.
Rest of the route was no problem as was evidenced.
The moaning about the moaning is worse as it's usually without any substantial points. Just moaning.There is no course that someone, usually many someones, won’t complain about. I’m not saying it’s not a topic for discussion, I’m saying that the level of moaning about tactics, course design, and the race overall is way overdone, and often fairly detached from a realistic view of what the teams, riders, or course designers really are trying to accomplish.
It is difficult to rate the Tour sometimes because the quality of the GC battle can be very different in-the-moment, versus in retrospect.You & I remember those Tours very differently.
2003 - there was zero contest. The only element of doubt was Lance being Lance and not going full gas
2007 - Rasmussen was dominating quite easily until his holiday antics were revealed to the world
2011 - A fourth rate climber holding yellow for half the race because Evans & Schleck were afraid to go for it because they wanted their teams to have it easy until the final mountain stage.
yeah no.
And the moaning about the moaning about the moaning?The moaning about the moaning is worse as it's usually without any substantial points. Just moaning.
You wouldn't expect anything else from a moaner like me.And the moaning about the moaning about the moaning?
Seriously?Re time limit, I think it was absolutely laughable this year. I think they extended it on three seperate stages. If you can't make the cut, youre out.. simple as. Always leaves a sour taste in my mouth when these rules are extended or even not reinforced because a large group of riders are abusing the system. I think thats a very legitimate critic of the race and the direction of the race. -1 for that!
The moaning about the moaning is worse as it's usually without any substantial points. Just moaning.
frankly i think the solution is just to expand the field and add two more legitimately tiny teams that will be happy to do the breaks.Think course and stage design is very much worth discussing/responding to or whatever. Commentators say riders make the race, but fail to also say that the riders cannot make the race without a route to do it on. So it should be the route designer's main objective to actually give the riders reasons to race and a proper course to do that one so they at least can say "well, we did that we had to do, the riders didn't". ASO has been quite successfull lately, but them moaning about boring flat stages mostly falls back on themselves in this year's TdF. People pointed that out quite early, so it was really was not to the surprise of many in here that it panned out the way it did.
Rest of the route was no problem as was evidenced.
Also terrible.And the moaning about the moaning about the moaning?
frankly i think the solution is just to expand the field and add two more legitimately tiny teams that will be happy to do the breaks.
though as far as problems in the Tour de France goes, "the sprint stages were even more boring than usual" is not high on my list, as i solved this problem in a very simple way: i didn't watch most of the sprint stages
C'mon, toby. I know you can moan louder than that. MOAN!Also terrible.
Only the moaning about the moaning (and the appraisal of the moaning about the moaning) are good.
i mean, the thing is, that this was pretty much a normal way to follow the Tour de France until relatively recently.I did the same (apart from the final 20 something kilometers) but that hardly means it shouldn't be considered.
REPORTED for BAITING!C'mon, toby. I know you can moan louder than that. MOAN!
Yet you watch it, what does that make you?Not everyone believes the Tour should be an actual race.
Yes the riders surely can if state of affairs regarding present situation both GC wise and other competitions, stages up to and stages ahead.if you want a stage design moan, i am still mad the one GT stage that i was most excited about last year, the one that i thought had the best parcours and best opportunities to tear up the race, totally sucked.
come on guys. you can't make this one interesting????
You misunderstood me. I was giving an answer to someone elses question, its not my belief - which is riders should be trying their best on every stage. Guys who can win several stages should try to do so, not take it easy for 19 stages & wait for the final time trial.Yet you watch it, what does that make you?