frenchfry said:He of the gun lovin' nation.
We could have used you at Charlie Hebdo earlier today.
Well I don't own a weapon. But days like today I truly wish for the terrorist to get what they deserve.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
frenchfry said:He of the gun lovin' nation.
We could have used you at Charlie Hebdo earlier today.
Amsterhammer said:I totally distance myself from foxxy's borderline racist views, and I utterly condemn the way he uses the deranged acts of some individuals to slander an entire religion. Shameful.
No, I am not brainwashed by anyone.
Glenn_Wilson said:Well I don't own a weapon. But days like today I truly wish for the terrorist to get what they deserve.
Rechtschreibfehler said:The reason no one here is taking you serious
Descender said:I take him seriously. And I find it hard to disagree with him.
For all it's worth, I'm a foreigner living in Germany.
Religion is a plague, and Islam, right now, is the worst of them all.
FoxxyBrown1111 said:I apologize to you (and only you guys) who share my thinking.
( ... )
The others? Well, I just wish you to wake up one day, and hope for you not crossing the way of the ever growing moslems in our countries wanting to harm you. You shall know one thing: There is no good/bad islam. The terrorists go by the book of quran. The other believers in the book of evil are silent yes men. Why? Because you never see moslems demonstrate against the killings by moslems, but only see them spill hate ("Jews to gas" for example) or doing harm to innocents.
I am deeply sorry for you. No more, no less... And yes, you are brainwashed. You just can´t accept this hard truth.
Maaaaaaaarten said:Yes, everybody who doesn't share your thinking is brainwashed. Oh us poor unbelievers. If only we would see the truth! But 'alas, 't appears that "those who disbelieve are deaf, dumb and blind; they do not understand." (Surat Al-Baqarah (2):171). You're slowly starting to sound like those religious fundamentalists you so despise, you know.
FoxxyBrown1111 said:Stop insulting me. I am NOT a racist. A racist is against races. Get it!
The terrorists are not some individuals. They go by the book killing "disbelievers". Get it!
And now sleep on...
If you ban Islam from Europe, these people will find something else to kill in the name of. The problem is not religion, you can interpret it in every which way you want. The problem is extremism.FoxxyBrown1111 said:Poor boy... because I don´t believe in any religion. So you have your "argument" with yourself.
How about to try to coment my posts? What you think of the countless "Allahu Akbar" attackers, the religion wars between moslems (oh how stupid is that), the moslem demonstrants chanting "Jews to gas", the women getting raped in the name of quran, islamic protesters against cartoons , non-protests against killings in the name of the islam, travel warnings for countries where 10% (speak moslems) of the population spread war and terror over the peaceful majority (like in the beautiful country of Kenya), and so on? Rhetorical. If you´d think about that, instead of trying to bait me, you´d see you are fooling yourself... Thus, the last laugh is on me (and the silent masses who are against islamisation of Europe).
Amsterhammer said:You want to argue semantics with me? Ok, maybe technically I should have called you a bigot rather than a racist. But I'm kind of old fashioned about things like this. To me, someone who directs the kind of vitriol that you do against an entire religion, is just as much of a racist s someone who directs vitriol and hate against people of another color. Discrimination is discrimination, whether it is on the basis of race, color, or religion. You should be deeply ashamed of yourself for sharing the views of the most repulsive far right elements in European society.
theyoungest said:If you ban Islam from Europe, these people will find something else to kill in the name of. The problem is not religion, you can interpret it in every which way you want. The problem is extremism.
hrotha said:Seriously Foxxy, you attack other people all the time by calling them brainwashed lemmings. Why wouldn't that count as an insult?
It *is* a personal attack, you're using it against specific people who are debating here with you. The other side could perfectly well say that you are indeed objectively bigoted or whatever and that it's just food for thought. If you want others to drop the personal attacks, you should do the same.FoxxyBrown1111 said:I am playing by the rules. Zilch personal attacks. If people feel offended as being the brainwashed I mean, they have some food for thaught... But I never ever got personal (unless I defend personal insults with counter insults. This is fair game for me. Always will be).
hrotha said:It *is* a personal attack, you're using it against specific people who are debating here with you. The other side could perfectly well say that you are indeed objectively bigoted or whatever and that it's just food for thought. If you want others to drop the personal attacks, you should do the same.
solidarity, but… there is, unfortunately, a lot of this in the U.S. too…Amsterhammer said:You want to argue semantics with me? Ok, maybe technically I should have called you a bigot rather than a racist. But I'm kind of old fashioned about things like this. To me, someone who directs the kind of vitriol that you do against an entire religion, is just as much of a racist as someone who directs vitriol and hate against people of another color. Discrimination is discrimination, whether it is on the basis of race, color, or religion. You should be deeply ashamed of yourself for sharing the views of the most repulsive far right elements in European society.
ray j willings said:So we now have spinning stars along with the speed of light and the mass of stars.
The creationist argument is dead
theyoungest said:If you ban Islam from Europe, these people will find something else to kill in the name of. The problem is not religion, you can interpret it in every which way you want. The problem is extremism.
BigMac said:Aye, Foxxy, Brother, I hear you.
Merckx index said:Where is it explained in the Koran? Can you point me to a passage explaining the context?
Merckx index said:The fact that you can cite passages indicating religious tolerance doesn’t reassure me. On the contrary, it makes the Koran appear schizo, saying there is no compulsion in one verse, exhorting followers to kill non-believers in another. If it’s true that the orders to kill were only given for the case of self-defense, then I find this a pretty major flaw in a Holy Book for this not to be emphasized. It is in fact NOT easy to take a quote out of its context IF some care is taken in describing exactly what one means.
Merckx index said:Not to mention the fact that a genuine religion ought to be far more concerned with describing how its followers are to awaken than encouraging them to fight battles, even if the battles are in self-defense.
9:13: Would you not fight a people who broke their oaths and determined to expel the Messenger, and they had begun [the attack upon] you the first time? Do you fear them? But Allah has more right that you should fear Him, if you are [truly] believers.
9:5: And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
9:4: Excepted are those with whom you made a treaty among the polytheists and then they have not been deficient toward you in anything or supported anyone against you; so complete for them their treaty until their term [has ended].
hrotha said:It *is* a personal attack, you're using it against specific people who are debating here with you. The other side could perfectly well say that you are indeed objectively bigoted or whatever and that it's just food for thought. If you want others to drop the personal attacks, you should do the same.