snackattack
BANNED
- Mar 20, 2012
- 581
- 0
- 0
Fearless Greg Lemond said:He should go to normal court, he is withheld the opportunity to make a living out of his 'profession'. Twelve years is a joke, add four years and get on with it.
ShrubberyBlue said:Follow the rules or follow a different profession. You can get struck off other professions and have no comeback because rules aren't followed. What makes this one any different. I'd have increased his ban to 24 years for just having the audacity of trying to overturn it.
Riders like him need to disappear in the far distance and never be seen again.
I do see you know very little on law.ShrubberyBlue said:Follow the rules or follow a different profession. You can get struck off other professions and have no comeback because rules aren't followed. What makes this one any different. I'd have increased his ban to 24 years for just having the audacity of trying to overturn it.
Riders like him need to disappear in the far distance and never be seen again.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:I do see you know very little on law.
Of course the boy is a doper but a 14 years sentence? Who did he kill actually?
CAS should have given him mental health aid, and a contract on 'a clean team'.
Matey Cobo was allowed to win the Vuelta, remember? But hey, he was clean as a whistle on Pena
That would be 2 strikes as well.
rhubroma said:Tragic end to a talented rider, not that he didn't bring it all upon himself of course.
Now I don't support the guy in any way (so don’t misunderstand me), however, his brazenness on the bike is matched by the audacity off it with which he continues to insolently react before the evidence, and the way he's denounced the hypocrisy in the sport.
I don't admire these qualities, though one must admit that in remaining true to character - when he could have otherwise just as easily feigned a wholesome "good boy" act to get good conduct points and perhaps leniency - Ricco accomplishes a sensational performance down to the bitter end. A shotgun performance that was not unlike his enthusiastic racing style.
Too bad this really exceptional performer is a punk and morally repugnant, though perhaps no less so than many of his colleagues who are merely more hypocritical than he.
nevada said:part him , part infrastructure.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:He should go to normal court, he is withheld the opportunity to make a living out of his 'profession'. Twelve years is a joke, add four years and get on with it.
as opposed to every other rider?MarkvW said:Unfortunately, Ricco's "profession" was doping to win professional bicycle races.
He should think himself lucky not to have both died and wound up in court on criminal charges. As such he has gotten off extremely lightly.Fearless Greg Lemond said:He should go to normal court, he is withheld the opportunity to make a living out of his 'profession'. Twelve years is a joke, add four years and get on with it.
ultimobici said:He should think himself lucky not to have both died and wound up in court on criminal charges. As such he has gotten off extremely lightly.
Funny how you can be so lenient towards a confirmed doping cheat yet want to strip riders from several decades ago on far less.
BroDeal said:The scapegoating of Ricco is complete. There is something really messed up when Ricco gets twelve years while Leipheimer, Vande Velde and such are banned for six months, the Spanish doep with impunity, the head of the UCI facilitates the Brits making a mockery of cycling, and JV ends up running the sport.
zigmeister said:No fan of Ricco on the doping front. But this same logic and theory can be applied to Armstrong, or any rider that got more than just 6 months.
zigmeister said:Ricco's issue is that he was busted 1 previously, so a longer penalty is fitting. But, 12yrs?!?!
BroDeal said:The scapegoating of Ricco is complete. There is something really messed up when Ricco gets twelve years while Leipheimer, Vande Velde and such are banned for six months, the Spanish doep with impunity, the head of the UCI facilitates the Brits making a mockery of cycling, and JV ends up running the sport.
Wallace said:I'm not saying that Ricco isn't being scapegoated (although if he is, he has only himself to blame for not understanding that being an unrepentant, unapologetic doper is not going to sit well with governing authorities--it's not how you play the game), but you seem to be missing something here, which is that this is his second offense so he's supposed to get a life time ban. That's the way it works. 1st positive=2 years, 2nd=life time. For Leipheimer (well, he's problematic, what with the almost forgotten 1996 ephedrine pos, but never mind) Vande Velde, etc. the admissions were all first offenses. If Ricco had followed the example of Ivan B after his first ban (who actually called Ricco up to offer advice during his brief come back), he'd still be racing today. Essentially Ricco was kicked out of the sport for being a complete and total gibbering moron. It's hard to make any kind of a real scandal out of that.
BroDeal said:The scapegoating of Ricco is complete. There is something really messed up when Ricco gets twelve years while Leipheimer, Vande Velde and such are banned for six months, the Spanish doep with impunity, the head of the UCI facilitates the Brits making a mockery of cycling, and JV ends up running the sport.
At least this one was fun to watch ulti.ultimobici said:Funny how you can be so lenient towards a confirmed doping cheat yet want to strip riders from several decades ago on far less.
Edited by modMrs John Murphy said:Ain't that the truth.
If only Ricco were Spanish. If he were British he'd have got a knighthood and plenty of awards and everyone would be gushing over his 'refreshing quirky tell it how it is personality'.
Beech Mtn said:Or if only Ricco were Popo. Then he could be police-raided, named in half a dozen investigations, and high on UCI's suspicion index, but keep riding right along, no questions asked, never suspended.