Richmond 2015 World Championships, Sep 19-27

Page 23 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Re:

Jagartrott said:
I don't understand why he doesn't stitch the sandpaper to his pants (downwards) instead of like this. Seems way less painful with the same effect.
I think it wouldn't have the same effect, the sandpaper on the saddle prevents the lycra on the bibs sliding off, whereas sandpaper on the bibs wouldn't stop the sliding because the saddle is too smooth I think, iow the sandpaper won't have any grip on the saddle.
 
Jun 3, 2012
2,873
200
11,880
So who will be the ones to look out for in the u23 race? I reckon Doull will be really strong, looks to be in terrific shape. Moscon could do nice, how is he after his dnf in Avenir?

The Danes will be really strong too I think with Würtz, Kamp and Kragh all likely to feature.
 
Jul 5, 2010
518
0
9,580
There is something funny about all this talk about getting "rid of" Degenkolb and Kristoff. It seems that people still don't get that these two guys are two of the toughest classics riders out there at the moment. They won in PR and RVV because they were the strongest rider in the race that day, not because they managed to barely hold on to a sprint.
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,894
2,255
25,680
Re:

kanari said:
There is something funny about all this talk about getting "rid of" Degenkolb and Kristoff. It seems that people still don't get that these two guys are two of the toughest classics riders out there at the moment. They won in PR and RVV because they were the strongest rider in the race that day, not because they managed to barely hold on to a sprint.
Kristoff at RvV, yes. Degenkolb at PR, nope. He had no trouble following wheels, but that's all he did, and he didn't show to be the strongest. Still though, that's largely irrelevant; everybody else does HAVE to drop them if they want to have a chance, no matter how hard that actually is.
 
Jul 5, 2010
518
0
9,580
Re: Re:

[/quote]Kristoff at RvV, yes. Degenkolb at PR, nope. He had no trouble following wheels, but that's all he did, and he didn't show to be the strongest. Still though, that's largely irrelevant; everybody else does HAVE to drop them if they want to have a chance, no matter how hard that actually is.[/quote]

You are absolutely right about that of course. I guess I'm just trying to point out that for one of these two to win it doesn't necessarily need to come from a reduced bunch sprint scenario.
 
Apr 15, 2014
4,254
2,341
18,680
Re: Re:

hrotha said:
Kristoff at RvV, yes. Degenkolb at PR, nope. He had no trouble following wheels, but that's all he did, and he didn't show to be the strongest. Still though, that's largely irrelevant; everybody else does HAVE to drop them if they want to have a chance, no matter how hard that actually is.
Degenkolb did close a big gap in a quite impressive way - alone.
 
Mar 19, 2009
9,892
1,790
20,680
Re:

SeriousSam said:
Good to see that women's cycling is getting some mainstream coverage. Here at the BBC:

Wiggins, Froome and Vos make a good case for the mantle of world's best cyclist, but there is a new pretender to the title.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/cycling/

What does everyone think. Is Pauline the world's best cyclist, edging out Froome, Wiggins and Vos?

Everything about that question is ridiculous.
 
Jun 25, 2012
1,228
833
12,680
Re:

Bushman said:
Modvind could do nice, how is he after his dnf in Avenir?

The Danes will be really strong too I think with Würtz, Kamp and Kragh all likely to feature.

I guess you mean Moscon but that would have been the greatest name for a cyclist ever.

He is one of the favorites for sure but there could be some surprises. For the danish team I hope for Alexander Kamp who apparently don't have a contract w a big team yet.
 
Aug 18, 2013
259
104
9,230
Re: Re:

kanari said:
Kristoff at RvV, yes. Degenkolb at PR, nope. He had no trouble following wheels, but that's all he did, and he didn't show to be the strongest. Still though, that's largely irrelevant; everybody else does HAVE to drop them if they want to have a chance, no matter how hard that actually is.

You are absolutely right about that of course. I guess I'm just trying to point out that for one of these two to win it doesn't necessarily need to come from a reduced bunch sprint scenario.
I think most people just hate a sprinter to win a classic in general. Not because they are Degenkolb or Kristoff. We want someone brave enough to attack and get rewarded in a one day race, but not wait for a bunch sprint.

If they attack and win, I don't mind they become world champion.
 
May 25, 2010
8,863
414
18,580
Re: Re:

Jagartrott said:
hrotha said:
Kristoff at RvV, yes. Degenkolb at PR, nope. He had no trouble following wheels, but that's all he did, and he didn't show to be the strongest. Still though, that's largely irrelevant; everybody else does HAVE to drop them if they want to have a chance, no matter how hard that actually is.
Degenkolb did close a big gap in a quite impressive way - alone.

Indeed. When he had to stop following wheels he did and he did it in quite an impressive way. Closing (30secs?) alone to GVA and Lampaert. He was probably atleast one of the strongest that day.
He needs to realise though that he is capable to putting the hammer down himself and that he shouldn't blindly rely on his sprint. In the TdF that didn't bring him anywhere. Boonen doesn't always wait for the sprint as well...
 
May 25, 2010
8,863
414
18,580
Re: Re:

dicanio_michael said:
kanari said:
Kristoff at RvV, yes. Degenkolb at PR, nope. He had no trouble following wheels, but that's all he did, and he didn't show to be the strongest. Still though, that's largely irrelevant; everybody else does HAVE to drop them if they want to have a chance, no matter how hard that actually is.

You are absolutely right about that of course. I guess I'm just trying to point out that for one of these two to win it doesn't necessarily need to come from a reduced bunch sprint scenario.
I think most people just hate a sprinter to win a classic in general. Not because they are Degenkolb or Kristoff. We want someone brave enough to attack and get rewarded in a one day race, but not wait for a bunch sprint.

If they attack and win, I don't mind they become world champion.

If Kristoff wins in a way he won RVV then I don't have a problem with him winning, but since he's telling everyone that he's hoping for a bunch sprint I don't want him to win.
 
Nov 26, 2014
534
5
4,595
Re: Re:

jaylew said:
SeriousSam said:
Good to see that women's cycling is getting some mainstream coverage. Here at the BBC:

Wiggins, Froome and Vos make a good case for the mantle of world's best cyclist, but there is a new pretender to the title.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/cycling/

What does everyone think. Is Pauline the world's best cyclist, edging out Froome, Wiggins and Vos?

Everything about that question is ridiculous.

of course, she is same mistake as brochard as world champion
equally ridiculous is say that froome of wiggins could have something common with best cyclist by winning only TDF or some TT
 
Jun 3, 2012
2,873
200
11,880
Re: Re:

ciranda said:
Bushman said:
Modvind could do nice, how is he after his dnf in Avenir?

The Danes will be really strong too I think with Würtz, Kamp and Kragh all likely to feature.

I guess you mean Moscon but that would have been the greatest name for a cyclist ever.

He is one of the favorites for sure but there could be some surprises. For the danish team I hope for Alexander Kamp who apparently don't have a contract w a big team yet.

Damn autocorrect.

Kamp could do it on a great day, but I feel like you never know with him. Seems a bit hit or miss, sometimes.
 
Jun 15, 2015
273
0
0
Re: Re:

Kwibus said:
If Kristoff wins in a way he won RVV then I don't have a problem with him winning, but since he's telling everyone that he's hoping for a bunch sprint I don't want him to win.

Don't worry, Edvald's got this ;)
 
Mar 19, 2009
3,551
3,720
19,180
Re: Re:

hrotha said:
kanari said:
There is something funny about all this talk about getting "rid of" Degenkolb and Kristoff. It seems that people still don't get that these two guys are two of the toughest classics riders out there at the moment. They won in PR and RVV because they were the strongest rider in the race that day, not because they managed to barely hold on to a sprint.
Kristoff at RvV, yes. Degenkolb at PR, nope. He had no trouble following wheels, but that's all he did, and he didn't show to be the strongest. Still though, that's largely irrelevant; everybody else does HAVE to drop them if they want to have a chance, no matter how hard that actually is.

I have this the other way around, Kristoff was smart following Terpstra and got dragged to the line, without doing much but being smart, which is great, but still following a wheel. Degenkolb on the other hand was always in the perfect position on the cobbles at PR, which is in itself a strong achievement, and once he had to be active, attacked and closed down the essential gap alone. After that he didn't stop working, and after the group regained numbers played it smart. And rightly so.
 
Jun 15, 2015
273
0
0
Both Kristoff and Degenkolb were the strongest rider in RvV and PR respectively. Kristoff could have dropped Terpstra up Paterberg the last time, but would have been in trouble against the chasers. He did like 75% of the work from there on in.
Degenkolb actually made the race making moves from the favorite group, no way that was an undeserved win.
 
Apr 12, 2015
7,060
1,204
20,680
Isn't there more cobbles than just on the climbs?

The route on Zwift indicates that there are city cobbles for a good part of the route. Could perhaps be another place to attack.