rick james
BANNED
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Perhaps they should have. Their idea was to go to the summit with as many teammates as possible, and that's a respectable tactic given the nature of the finale.Netserk said:The team did very well. Impressive performance.Alexandre B. said:They tried. They failed. But they tried.hrotha said:That was one of the most baffling things I've ever seen in cycling. Bardet and AG2R acted like putting time on Froome was no biggie.
That said, the captains (not just Bardet) should have attacked before Froome bridged. So they should probably have used up their doms more quickly.
They had Bakelandts up ahead. And saving teammates only works if someone more important than Quintana has been distanced. As long as Vuillermoz was pulling the group, it's understandable (although wrong, imo) that the other captains were hesitant. Ag2r were the ones who controlled the scenario; as such they had most responsibility.Alexandre B. said:Perhaps they should have. Their idea was to go to the summit with as many teammates as possible, and that's a respectable tactic given the nature of the finale.Netserk said:The team did very well. Impressive performance.Alexandre B. said:They tried. They failed. But they tried.hrotha said:That was one of the most baffling things I've ever seen in cycling. Bardet and AG2R acted like putting time on Froome was no biggie.
That said, the captains (not just Bardet) should have attacked before Froome bridged. So they should probably have used up their doms more quickly.
Blaming a rider and his team for trying to shake things up is harsh, especially since everyone on this forum seems to praise Uran who is six seconds behind and who tried absolutely nothing.
If they thought the pace was not high enough, they could have worked. They decided to rely on the pace set by Gautier ; good for them.Netserk said:They had Bakelandts up ahead. And saving teammates only works if someone more important than Quintana has been distanced. As long as Vuillermoz was pulling the group, it's understandable (although wrong, imo) that the other captains were hesitant. Ag2r were the ones who controlled the scenario; as such they had most responsibility.Alexandre B. said:Perhaps they should have. Their idea was to go to the summit with as many teammates as possible, and that's a respectable tactic given the nature of the finale.Netserk said:The team did very well. Impressive performance.Alexandre B. said:They tried. They failed. But they tried.hrotha said:That was one of the most baffling things I've ever seen in cycling. Bardet and AG2R acted like putting time on Froome was no biggie.
That said, the captains (not just Bardet) should have attacked before Froome bridged. So they should probably have used up their doms more quickly.
Blaming a rider and his team for trying to shake things up is harsh, especially since everyone on this forum seems to praise Uran who is six seconds behind and who tried absolutely nothing.
Going faster in the 30km mostly downhill finale. It seems clear to me.Netserk said:Just saw again when Froome bridged. Bardet had three! teammates with him at that point. What value did they have after Froome bridged?
And what was the point of going faster in the 30 km mostly downhill finale for its own sake?Alexandre B. said:Going faster in the 30km mostly downhill finale. It seems clear to me.Netserk said:Just saw again when Froome bridged. Bardet had three! teammates with him at that point. What value did they have after Froome bridged?
Avoid to nullify all the teamwork because Sky would have temporized?hrotha said:And what was the point of going faster in the 30 km mostly downhill finale for its own sake?Alexandre B. said:Going faster in the 30km mostly downhill finale. It seems clear to me.Netserk said:Just saw again when Froome bridged. Bardet had three! teammates with him at that point. What value did they have after Froome bridged?
Maybe they were hoping Froome would get another mechanical a bit later on?hrotha said:And what was the point of going faster in the 30 km mostly downhill finale for its own sake?Alexandre B. said:Going faster in the 30km mostly downhill finale. It seems clear to me.Netserk said:Just saw again when Froome bridged. Bardet had three! teammates with him at that point. What value did they have after Froome bridged?
I don't think I understand what you mean. Could you rephrase?Alexandre B. said:Avoid to nullify all the teamwork because Sky would have temporized?hrotha said:And what was the point of going faster in the 30 km mostly downhill finale for its own sake?
They didn't want their work to be scrapped, hence why they kept going. I don't think Sky would have set a good enough pace.hrotha said:I don't think I understand what you mean. Could you rephrase?Alexandre B. said:Avoid to nullify all the teamwork because Sky would have temporized?hrotha said:And what was the point of going faster in the 30 km mostly downhill finale for its own sake?
What other team could do anything today? They were all isolated in the group, except Bardet.Tonton said:Maybe the LeMond article in the "Home" section answers the question about tactics, except that it wasn't Sky but AG2R who attempted to whack Aru out of contention.
Having said that, today showed what most suspected: Froome/Sky is/are beatable. It's up to the other contenders to help make it happen, or at least participate, instead of sitting back, letting AG2R do all the work and hope to benefit in the end.
Sky has been vulnerable on numerous occasions and yet their closest competitors(Bardet, Uran, Aru) have done almost nothing to capitalize on that. The only successful attack has been Aru's win on PdBF, others were all neutralized. And there is 0 guarantee that another chance will pop up.Tonton said:Maybe the LeMond article in the "Home" section answers the question about tactics, except that it wasn't Sky but AG2R who attempted to whack Aru out of contention.
Having said that, today showed what most suspected: Froome/Sky is/are beatable. It's up to the other contenders to help make it happen, or at least participate, instead of sitting back, letting AG2R do all the work and hope to benefit in the end.
I'm not necessarily talking about today, but moving forward...the question is: who's willing to risk a blowback? I'm afraid that only Bardet has that win-all-or-lose-all attitude...for example, I don't trust Aru one bit: he'll wait for others to kill each other and collect the pieces.Netserk said:What other team could do anything today? They were all isolated in the group, except Bardet.Tonton said:Maybe the LeMond article in the "Home" section answers the question about tactics, except that it wasn't Sky but AG2R who attempted to whack Aru out of contention.
Having said that, today showed what most suspected: Froome/Sky is/are beatable. It's up to the other contenders to help make it happen, or at least participate, instead of sitting back, letting AG2R do all the work and hope to benefit in the end.
Forever The Best said:If their tactic was staying away from Froome on the climb and hammering on the flattish part with doms they messed up. As soon as Froome was closing the gap Bardet should've attacked and cooperated with whoever comes with him.
Tonton said:I'm afraid that only Bardet has that win-all-or-lose-all attitude...
No, he didn't. He attacked after Froome came back, and not even immediately afterwards. And he sat up like a nanosecond later.ppanther92 said:Forever The Best said:If their tactic was staying away from Froome on the climb and hammering on the flattish part with doms they messed up. As soon as Froome was closing the gap Bardet should've attacked and cooperated with whoever comes with him.
Which he did and Uran refused to work.
Talking about collecting pieces, Bardet was the one who profited from Aru going early and burying himself against that 20% wall.Tonton said:I'm not necessarily talking about today, but moving forward...the question is: who's willing to risk a blowback? I'm afraid that only Bardet has that win-all-or-lose-all attitude...for example, I don't trust Aru one bit: he'll wait for others to kill each other and collect the pieces.Netserk said:What other team could do anything today? They were all isolated in the group, except Bardet.Tonton said:Maybe the LeMond article in the "Home" section answers the question about tactics, except that it wasn't Sky but AG2R who attempted to whack Aru out of contention.
Having said that, today showed what most suspected: Froome/Sky is/are beatable. It's up to the other contenders to help make it happen, or at least participate, instead of sitting back, letting AG2R do all the work and hope to benefit in the end.
He attacked way too late. He should've already attacked when the gap was down to 30 seconds. And his attack wasn't even a proper attack, he stopped 2 or 3 seconds after it.ppanther92 said:Forever The Best said:If their tactic was staying away from Froome on the climb and hammering on the flattish part with doms they messed up. As soon as Froome was closing the gap Bardet should've attacked and cooperated with whoever comes with him.
Which he did and Uran refused to work.
Tonton said:Maybe the LeMond article in the "Home" section answers the question about tactics, except that it wasn't Sky but AG2R who attempted to whack Aru out of contention.
Having said that, today showed what most suspected: Froome/Sky is/are beatable. It's up to the other contenders to help make it happen, or at least participate, instead of sitting back, letting AG2R do all the work and hope to benefit in the end.