Think she knew what she was doing. No one even remotely as strong as her on these climbs.2 SDW's in the group behind yet Kopecky so insistent it has to be herself that she drags Persico along, really hope itll bite her in the end
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Think she knew what she was doing. No one even remotely as strong as her on these climbs.2 SDW's in the group behind yet Kopecky so insistent it has to be herself that she drags Persico along, really hope itll bite her in the end
Yeah she looks a little bit stronger and also faster. I'm gonna watch her live in Brabantse Pijl, she will be up there. Yesterday she was up against SD Worx but was really strong. In Brabantse and Waalse pijl she can fight for the win already me thinks.They can all be great but I actually think Van Empel has the most road potential. With she and Pieterse it may come down to how much they focus on the road and how much mountain bike they wind up doing.
Completely agree. Cross isn't exactly the same but she was certainly faster in a sprint and a better climber than the other two there. Can't wait to see her really focusing on the roadYeah she looks a little bit stronger and also faster. I'm gonna watch her live in Brabantse Pijl, she will be up there. Yesterday she was up against SD Worx but was really strong. In Brabantse and Waalse pijl she can fight for the win already me thinks.
Persico not pulling in the chase. Must fancy her chances in the podium sprint?
Also most of the spectators are gone before the women arrive. But you would miss a lot from the men's race.Women should be sooner than men's race. How can we promote women cycling when we see this dreadful race after one of the best and thrilling Ronde we ever witnessed?
They do start drinking around 10 AM don't they?Also most of the spectators are gone before the women arrive.
(1)Also most of the spectators are gone before the women arrive. (2)But you would miss a lot from the men's race.
...and then either half the audience switch the women's race off and don't see it, or they miss the action in the men's race. As I said in the thread about it, that would work fine at races like Flèche where the action is condensed into a small amount of time no matter who is racing (and the women are in fact more likely to race from further out), but at de Ronde where actions 120km out could be significant, it's less likely to be beneficial.Women should be sooner than men's race. How can we promote women cycling when we see this dreadful race after one of the best and thrilling Ronde we ever witnessed?
Women should be sooner than men's race. How can we promote women cycling when we see this dreadful race after one of the best and thrilling Ronde we ever witnessed?
Women should be sooner than men's race. How can we promote women cycling when we see this dreadful race after one of the best and thrilling Ronde we ever witnessed?
That was a bit boring.
Would likely have been much better if Weibes going down on the front on the Koppenberg hadn't created the winning break.No offence to Marty on TV, but that was a pretty lacklustre race.....the other teams don't have an answer whether in legs, or race tactics....
Would likely have been much better if Weibes going down on the front on the Koppenberg hadn't created the winning break.
SD Worx probably still win, and indeed potentially still with Kopecky as the strength she showed meant that I find it difficult to believe anybody would have lived with her in a fair fight, but certainly it doesn't feel like a fair fight was won.Would likely have been much better if Weibes going down on the front on the Koppenberg hadn't created the winning break.