Women should be sooner than men's race. How can we promote women cycling when we see this dreadful race after one of the best and thrilling Ronde we ever witnessed?
...and then either half the audience switch the women's race off and don't see it, or they miss the action in the men's race. As I said in the thread about it, that would work fine at races like Flèche where the action is condensed into a small amount of time no matter who is racing (and the women are in fact more likely to race from further out), but at de Ronde where actions 120km out could be significant, it's less likely to be beneficial.
I'd say that it's a mixed blessing borne out of the stage in professionalisation that women's cycling is at. They are at the stage where the races need beefing up for difficulty as the number of riders who are at a high enough level is increasing, and now they would benefit from increased diversity in styles of riders that can make it to the top; they are at the same time still at the point where there are only a small handful of top teams with sufficient funding to be competitive across the calendar and so a couple of overpowered teams like SD Worx are division-killers, especially if they continue to be as ruthless with the grey areas of the sport's behavioural code.
Edit: "Kasia, are you disappointed not to have been able to fight for the victory at the end there" I was waiting for her to say something like "have you seen how many top 5s, top 10s I have in major races since I last won one? Of course I'm disappointed but I'm pretty used to it by now"