- Jul 16, 2010
- 17,455
- 5
- 0
Echoes said:Well, sorry, it was probably not the right thing to do, but it's beyond me, I can't help.
Kuiper was a GC contender, which Raas was not.
I agree that it's been more balanced in recent years. There are more climbs now than in the seventies, in Flanders. Even Merckx concedes it. But still those climbs are short, there are far too many turns, which gives the riders the chance to take a breather as they slow down and, most importantly, there are short descents where you can recup, freewheeling.
In Paris-Roubaix there are virtually NO descents. You cannot recup between the sections. It's as if between Flanders' climb, it was just flat. This is why Paris-Roubaix blows away everything that can be made in a single day in the modern calendar.
I do agree on this. No question. It's close, I admit.
But, Sweet Jesus, already argued, time and again. This is WHY it should be placed at 2/3rd 3/4th of the route ! Otherwise they wait for it. Patersberg and Kwaremont at the end is just stupid. Kapelmuur is softer, that's why it should be at the end !
Discussed time and again too !
One of the greatest list of past winners. Long straight roads, over 298km, which tired the sprinters out until these got access to ******** (the thing I'm not entitled to name otherwise I'd be banned).
Milan-Sanremo > Lombardy.
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=6415&highlight=Sanremo
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=12667&highlight=Sanremo
Libertine Seguros said:Yes, in the past it has had a great list of winners. But since Zabel's first win it's been a sprint practically every year. This year's edition was the first interesting one in years. The climbers and hilly classics guys no longer believe they can win, and just act as domestiques for the sprinters. As soon as Goss was named in the group of 70 or so this year, I knew he would win.
M-SR was once one of the greatest, toughest races on the calendar. But it simply isn't hard enough anymore.
It wouldn't make my list of least favourite races (Scheldeprijs has that one sewn up) but it's a long, long way from being the race it used to be.
Buffalo Soldier said:No flat cobbled sections in the last 100km?
la.margna said:about 9 flat cobbles in the last 100km
luckyboy said:The last one is Donderij after Steenbeekdries. None in the last 50km.
Panda Claws said:The guy that has made the decision to remove the Muur has said some more nonsense in an interview today.
Basically he wants the season to be put in 90 days with race after race. So cycling becomes more modern and more exciting.![]()
Mellow Velo said:Yeah, it would be great to sit out 270 days waiting.
Substitute pro for part time cycling. Just what the sponsors ordered.........
................not.
Dekker_Tifosi said:The Amstel Gold Race does 3 big laps around Valkenburg... it's not new
And Montreal and Quebec are circuit races and proven to be very entertaining.
Yet in Flanders, it feels like raping a classic
Duartista said:I wonder if this guy is influenced by the profitability of cyclocross in Flanders, and wants to emulate that on the road.
Can't imagine Paris-Roubaix, LBL or MSR following his lead even if this works. Maybe Lombardia would give it a go.
Race Radio said:While Traditionalist will scream I like the new finish. It is harder and better for spectators. It will be interested to see if it changes the type of rider who wins. The finale looks brutal
Duartista said:I wonder if this guy is influenced by the profitability of cyclocross in Flanders, and wants to emulate that on the road.
Can't imagine Paris-Roubaix, LBL or MSR following his lead even if this works. Maybe Lombardia would give it a go.
El Pistolero said:That's taken out of context though. He suggested something like what's going on in F1 right now, but with Grand Tours and classics as the most important events. But it was a bit silly to suggest only 90 racing days lol.