Race Radio said:You are correct. I am puzzled by the timing as well.
D-Queued said:Like a known doper* has told us, doping makes you ride backwards. The poor performance of Ferrari fueled dragsters is further proof of this.
Dave.
*Possibly a self-serving quote in this instance, of course
yeah, good reminder.westerner said:Tough day for Ryder and boss JV - lookin like clean era a myth, dark days still here.
Either they are like frogs on a lilly pad of naivety, did not have their fingers on the pulse like they thought or they are liars and credibility just did a big faceplant.
But the dark days are gone. “You just don’t think about it anymore,” he says. “It’s over.”
That’s what he wants Victorians, and cycling fans, to know.
jknox@timescolonist.com
hilarious.Peloton cleans up
So the irony, and what makes all this so hard for Hesjedal to talk about, is that revelations of his past put a blot on a sport that has — and he is proud of this — taken big steps to clean itself up.
“The peloton is nothing like it was,” he says. “There’s no pressure [to dope]. There are no teams employing systematic programs.
http://www.timescolonist.com/news/l...on-past-doping-1.1326391#sthash.kEf7JpQu.dpuf
never read the tugboat book.veganrob said:I think Tyler Hamilton addressed it in his book about BB's. Day after felt rather sluggish, then following days really kicked in
Benotti69 said:So Rabottini, Climbers jersey 2012 Giro, popped for EPO. Hmmm maybe he should ride clean like Hesjedal and go faster![]()
you forgot theD-Queued said:Competitors were doping when Ryder won?
rethorical question, right?D-Queued said:Competitors were doping when Ryder won? Cycling is full of surprises.
Dave.
D-Queued said:Competitors were doping when Ryder won? Cycling is full of surprises.
Dave.
sniper said:rethorical question, right?
Anyone who was really clean that Giro should have been disgusted to see Ryder win it.
But I haven't heard a single complaint.
izzystraddlin one or two pages upthread makes the same point and it's a fair point i guess.DirtyWorks said:And risk losing a future job? No way. Athletes inviting doping controversy do not get jobs.
sniper said:izzystraddlin one or two pages upthread makes the same point and it's a fair point i guess.
IzzyStradlin said:The nature of cycling tactics is a huge part of enforcing omerta.
As a clean pro you're not likely a GT or Classics contender. Most of your results are going to come at the mercy of the strong teams, breakaways or tactical situations. If you're outspoken, a team can easily ride against you to prevent you from getting in breaks, or chasing later in the race. GTs often see guys riding the front for no particular (tactical) reason.
Or, as a clean rider you're a nice guy, loyal domestique who supports a GT/Classics contender. Sure you might be clean, but your employment depends on keeping the faster, probably doped rider happy. And your boss on the road doesn't want to deal with team punishing him because a teammate is stirred up sh!t.
And if you're known as a valuable domestique, who knows where you might end up? I mean, look at Pate cashing checks from Sky. Best to not burn bridges before you get to them.
There are plenty of good practical reasons to just shut up and ride.
yeah, that was a good post.IzzyStradlin said:It was in the JV thread, but thank you for noticing:
sniper said:yeah, that was a good post.
still, it doesn't explain why some purportedly clean riders would proactively start promoting current-day pro-cycling as new mentality/new culture/clean(er), when any fool with half a brain can see that those labels do not apply.
pmcg76 said:I posted about times on Alpe d'Huez 2003 V 2001. Why the time differences? Why a 3.30 time difference for Lance?
well either that, or because they're not really clean of course.IzzyStradlin said:Because it's what their managers want?
sniper said:rethorical question, right?
Anyone who was really clean that Giro should have been disgusted to see Ryder win it.
But I haven't heard a single complaint.
