orangerider said:
Good point. It's also fairly very expensive infrastructure wise, with putting up barriers, security staff, obtaining road permits, and helicopter cams, road cams, all in real time transmission (fixed wing aircraft) are very expensive compared to stadiums/arenas where all that stuff is essentially permanently attached equipment.
Exactly. In most sports, there are three major sources of income for a team: sponsors, TV money and ticket sales. For a cycling team, it's only the first. The organizer is a third party in cycling, not like in many other sports where the host team sells the tickets and organizes the match. Result of this is that TV money is staying with the organizers, which is no problem for me.
Right now, cycling is more or less sustainable. Individual organizers and teams are sometimes in trouble, but there are no major issues with one group or another. Compare that to football (soccer): the players earn millions, but many clubs are in deep financial trouble.
Marcus135 said:
Kobe Bryant individually earns about 24 million before endorsements a year, that would be enough to fund two entire ProTour teams and im fairly sure that the average cyclist would put in just as many hours training, if not more. So yes in comparison to normal people they earn a bit more but compared to other sports they are paid far far less.
Cyclists earn every dollar they make and in my opinion they have every right to be paid more.
Well, this isn't how the world rolls. Cyclists still have shorter work days than many of us. According to your logic, they should earn less than normal people. It is simply a supply and demand issue, and as long as pro cycling is sustainable and the riders are able to make a decent to a very good living out of it, I don't see why they are entitled to earn more. Sure, I wouldn't object at all if they did, but I do think those comparisons are a bit silly.
Remember, no-one is forced to cycle a bike for a job. If cyclists want to take their chance to earn more elsewhere, they're more than free to do so.
DominicDecoco said:
Yeah, that's definitely Ronaldos fault with his 60 goals in this season being a huge part of securing a top spot in La Liga, semi finals in CL, shirt sales €100 million in revenues - and that was in 2010... ad two more years to it.., new sponsors, investors etc...
Money, money, money.
I think Real Madrid will cope... With a revenue of 695 million dollars and a operating income of 214 million dollars in 2012...
Football (soccer) as a sport in Spain and many other European countries is not sustainable at the current level. I'm sure Ronaldo brings in his money, but he needs team mates and either in the past or at the moment Madrid paid more than they earned, needing government help. It's not sustainable if you factor out populist politics. Not the way I would want to organize my sport.