i have nothing against gilbert. he is very exciting to watch and he has an amazing aceleration.
but to be the best or to dominate, you have to win. he didnt won any big classic so far besides lombardia against a sh*tty field both in riders' name and shape. still, i give credits to him to be in discussion in all momunents. but that doesnt matter. to a champion, you win or lose. he loses (besides lombardia).
what i dont like, is this hype.
and
"he is much younger than the others"-look at cancelara's age for example.
"he is so dominating"- i have this stupid theory: to dominate, you have to win. lol
etc etc..
amd parrulo, the reason that made me say that about TTs stage races etc is:
-not only bonnen cancellara and valverde etc are better at classics, they are much more better as cyclist if you look to the other side of their palmares. does gilbert even as another side? no.
even if he wins LBL ronde and PR next year, he will have to do it again to compete against other palmares (just counting classics).
there is an huge difference in class when you think about gilbert and valverde for example. maybe this just shows how we need new classics riders. there was an huge gap between bartoli mussew rebellin di luca bettini van petegem etc. now we only have gilbert just looking for classics.. and he isnt at the same level as others -not just classics- riders.
maybe now with EBH sagan mathews etc etc..