• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Scarponi up to his old tricks?

Mar 18, 2009
981
0
0
Visit site
The fridge in the blue trees said:
MMh, so every time somebody wins a stage now you plan to open a thread?

Every rider that wants to win TA is prepared for TA. Nibali, Scarponi etc.

Perhaps a 2 second search of the internet would answer the question you posed for the OP starting this thread.

Considering it's title and raising the question of old tricks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Scarponi

The dude was implicated in a doping scandal.
 
Jun 16, 2009
19,654
2
0
Visit site
msjett said:
Perhaps a 2 second search of the internet would answer the question you posed for the OP starting this thread.

Considering it's title and raising the question of old tricks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Scarponi

The dude was implicated in a doping scandal.

First, a google search takes more than 2 second.

Then, what does that have to do with anything? It's funny how in some cases a former doper is then declared clean (Millar, Zülle) and proof that clean riding is possible, others then are declared dirty forever. Just because he was caught doesn't mean somebody that wasn't caught is clean, the chances that he is clean are as big as that any other rider that was never caught is clean. Minimal in targeted races IMO...

Where is the "what is Gasparotto on" thread?
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
The fridge in the blue trees said:
First, a google search takes more than 2 second.

Then, what does that have to do with anything? It's funny how in some cases a former doper is then declared clean (Millar, Zülle) and proof that clean riding is possible, others then are declared dirty forever. Just because he was caught doesn't mean somebody that wasn't caught is clean, the chances that he is clean are as big as that any other rider that was never caught is clean. Minimal in targeted races IMO...

Where is the "what is Gasparotto on" thread?

Zulle came back clean? Really?

We already know what Gasparotto is on. Ferrari's Orange Juice

104f0h2.jpg
 
Jun 16, 2009
19,654
2
0
Visit site
Hugh Januss said:
Easy there turbo, she is not making excuses for him. Take a breath and go back and read the exchange again.

From what i understand, she is saying we shouldn't judge him so harshly that he is back on the PED's because he has served a suspension.

i don't feel that's completely right.
 
Jul 23, 2009
2,891
1
0
Visit site
auscyclefan94 said:
From what i understand, she is saying we shouldn't judge him so harshly that he is back on the PED's because he has served a suspension.

i don't feel that's completely right.

She's saying that there was a lot more linking Scarponi to doping than mere implication.
 
Mar 18, 2009
981
0
0
Visit site
The fridge in the blue trees said:
First, a google search takes more than 2 second.

Then, what does that have to do with anything? It's funny how in some cases a former doper is then declared clean (Millar, Zülle) and proof that clean riding is possible, others then are declared dirty forever. Just because he was caught doesn't mean somebody that wasn't caught is clean, the chances that he is clean are as big as that any other rider that was never caught is clean. Minimal in targeted races IMO...

Where is the "what is Gasparotto on" thread?

Ok so I should have said a 10 second search....but lets not split hairs.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Big GMaC said:
Who is in that photo?

Vino in the T-Mobile Kit, who else?

no, that is Patrick Sinkewitz

Far left, Il Falco, Paolo Savoldelli, Discovery Channel

Middle, hand up, Tom Danielson, Discovery Channel

Enrico Gasparotto, Liquigas

anonymous fat guys.

Dont know the Quickstep guy off-hand, without a close up and a google search.