- May 20, 2009
- 8,934
- 7
- 17,495
Sorry to break the news to you, Andy, you're NOT Lance.shalgo said:"If you look at the past, Lance Armstrong won the Tour seven times and you never saw him in any races other than the Tour."
Sorry to break the news to you, Andy, you're NOT Lance.shalgo said:"If you look at the past, Lance Armstrong won the Tour seven times and you never saw him in any races other than the Tour."
Christian said:It's not an excuse and it's hardly a surprise. This much is true: he needs to be in better shape for the Tour, especially for the start (as he says). With Bruyneel as his boss it was clear this was going to be their strategy to achieve that ... what did you expect?
You forget the Grosse Scheidegg stage, he worked for Fuglsang there.Libertine Seguros said:Do you, or do you not, believe Andy when he said he went "really deep" (his words, not mine) at País Vasco and Suisse?
For reference, at the Tour de Suisse he, over the course of 4 tough mountain stages, lost 6'10" in total to the noted climbing great José Joaquín Rojas. In the two stages he contested, Crans-Montana and Serfaus, he bested the Spanish climbing giant by 5 seconds and 13 seconds respectively, and was 147th out of 160 riders in the prologue.
Is that really the actions of somebody who went "really deep"?
Christian said:It's not an excuse and it's hardly a surprise. This much is true: he needs to be in better shape for the Tour, especially for the start (as he says). With Bruyneel as his boss it was clear this was going to be their strategy to achieve that ... what did you expect?
theyoungest said:You forget the Grosse Scheidegg stage, he worked for Fuglsang there.
Libertine Seguros said:Do you, or do you not, believe Andy when he said he went "really deep" (his words, not mine) at País Vasco and Suisse?
For reference, at the Tour de Suisse he, over the course of 4 tough mountain stages, lost 6'10" in total to the noted climbing great José Joaquín Rojas. In the two stages he contested, Crans-Montana and Serfaus, he bested the Spanish climbing giant by 5 seconds and 13 seconds respectively, and was 147th out of 160 riders in the prologue.
Is that really the actions of somebody who went "really deep"?
Kvinto said:I fail to see how doing a 'really deep' Pais Vasco (yeah, he isn't invisible there, but 'really deep') and focusing on the Ardennes Classics are the reasons why he reaches the Tour in 'bad' shape. And of course i disagree on that Armstrong wasn't seen in races other than the Tour.
Libertine Seguros said:Cadel's:
1st, Tirreno
Libertine Seguros said:I feel that the number of race days is the problem rather than the focus
Libertine Seguros said:Evans picked and chose a calendar that suited him and was able to be strong at all of them; Andy doesn't seem to have sorted that 100% just yet.
Christian said:That was quite amazing with 0 race days prior to the start
Christian said:Lol you mean after his chain popped twice and he changed bikes.
<snipped>
Don't think the Tirreno result would have been different if he'd skipped that one. Evans, like for instance Gesink and Horner, can simply train himself into form. These guys have a high base level. Which is what Schleck seems to lack.Libertine Seguros said:Evans raced Eroica, like Schleck. They finished together fwiw - Evans 30th, Schleck 31st.
El Pistolero said:Armstrong won the Dauphiné, Suisse and was always good at Amstel Gold Race. Kid doesn't know anything about cycling, ban him already. This stupidity is far worse than 50 pictogram clenbuterol.
Libertine Seguros said:Evans raced Eroica, like Schleck. They finished together fwiw - Evans 30th, Schleck 31st.
tidean said:"Evans had only raced for two days before Tirreno-Adriatico but won with a combination of strong and intelligent racing, backed up by a solid BMC team that included Alessandro Ballan and an on-form George Hincapie"
Christian said:It seems we were both wrong
Don't know what the other race was - anyhow, still amazing
Wasn't it that race in Switzerland? Where only 10 guys finished because of the crap weather? The GP Lugano or something.Christian said:It seems we were both wrong
Don't know what the other race was - anyhow, still amazing
shalgo said:Tell me this is a parody: Andy Schleck is now saying that in the past he has not focused enough on the Tour.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/andy-schleck-focused-more-than-ever-on-the-tour-de-france
"Maybe sometimes I did a bit too much to prepare these races, like doing Pays Basque and going really deep. I was focusing on the Classics maybe too much, and I've got to change this year so I'm better at the Tour, especially at the start of the Tour," Schleck said. "If you look at the past, Lance Armstrong won the Tour seven times and you never saw him in any races other than the Tour."
Echoes said:It did seem weird a Bore de France winner, riding the Classics and even Eroica going really deep. Crap mentality really.He doesn't even realize how refreshing it was, compared to his predecessors. At least if I get it right, he still wants to perform in the classics in 2012 ??
And at least, there's still Evans, Nibali and Gesink !
airstream said:hopefully you wont argue the ardennes and getting top-15 at the pays vasco require some effort.
Contador wins from January and thus honors every race he enters and its fans. Andy Schleck threats every race as if it's training which is disrespectful both to the race itself and to fans who care about cycling outside of July. I think it all comes down to laziness, the guy simply doesn't want to train hard for anything but TDF as he doesn't care. Even Armstrong had much better results outside of TDF than Andy has had the last two years. Then you have recent TDF winners like Contador and Evans who always ride to win, so it's not like it's not possible.airstream said:probably he meant a number of racing days itself. hopefully you wont argue the ardennes and getting top-15 at the pays vasco require some effort. i dont get 1 thing. do you have to be least lA to try to implement his preparation system?
 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		
 
				
		