jobiwan said:And this couldn't have gone in the rest day thread, or one of the 12 "Bash Schleck" threads on the front page??
12 clearly just isn't enough for this Forum. I'm Just waiting for the Baby Schleck snores in his sleep thread.
jobiwan said:And this couldn't have gone in the rest day thread, or one of the 12 "Bash Schleck" threads on the front page??
I think it would be good if Alberto could attack, because we can go with him. We have a good gap with him.
jobiwan said:And this couldn't have gone in the rest day thread, or one of the 12 "Bash Schleck" threads on the front page??
VoidSix said:I have no idea why the Schlecks get so much hate. Technically, Contador is the one that needs to attack. I imagine Frank and Andy were mostly just testing Contador. Given Contador's crash, if they weren't certain Contador was not going to hang with the GC contenders it would've been silly to attack and have Contador ride your wheel and then launch his own attack to take him back. Frank had over 2 minutes on him and Andy 1:45. They can both sustain that in the time trial.
It's not like they haven't attacked in prior years. There have only been a couple big stages, so I'm willing to wait for 18 and 19 before writing off the Schlecks. If they killed themselves last Saturday while Frank was ahead of the GC contenders and Andy was 9 seconds back from Cadel, everyone would be calling them idiots.
Bennyl said:If Andy needs a lesson in how to take responsibility and race like a champion, maybe he should take to Fabian, who never shirks a contest
Grayguard said:If you're referring to my post, no hate was meant - I just found the quote funny
But, I do disagree with you anyway, here is why:
Contador: Yes, he needs to attack still - but he was hurt/in poor form, call it what you like. The Schlecks could've likely eliminated him as GC contender by now - if they dared. Now, he seems be getting in better form, while his knee improves, he can definately still win this. (Imho)
Cadel: He's still very much in the race, and the Schlecks definately needs to take time from him before the TT. They already missed some chances to do this - they can't afford to miss many more...
Voeckler: This guy has impressed ALOT of people, including me. If the Schlecks doesn't gain some time on him, I actually think he could surprise them (and everyone else?) in the TT.
VoidSix said:Voeckler has been terrible in TTs. I know that people say he'd ride differently in the final time trial if he had yellow, but he has been terrible in every type of TT--even the prologues. I'm sure he'd get a little boost if he were in yellow, but he would still get beaten by Andy and probably by Frank as well. Which means he'd lose by even more to Contador and Evans.
It's easy for us to say that the Schlecks should have put Contador in the red. But we aren't out there. Contador is one of the greatest climbers and riders ever. Lance Armstrong said two years ago that even at his peak he wouldn't have been able to hang with Contador. Seems pretty silly to put Contador to the test when you already have a sustainable gap for the ITT and all you'd have to do is finish even with him on the mountains. Andy only lost 30 secs or so to Contador last year, and this years TT has more hills.
I agree they need to take time off Cuddles. I probably would've tried if I were them. But they only need 1-2 minutes on him, and I think they can easily take that with a decisive attack on either 18 or 19 (if on 19, Evans will have some serious Carlos Sastre flashbacks--Frank Schleck probably ahead in the GC, with Frank's teammate (Andy/Sastre) attacking L'Alpe D'Huez and Cuddles left alone to try to bring him back, in between Schleck and the leading group). As tough as he is climbing, Cadel can't hang with Basso, Schlecks x2, or even an out of shape Contador. He'll get dropped in the Alps.
The Schlecks are probably cautious about Evans. They're not quite where they want to be, but they know they have the tools and the opportunities in 18 and 19 to put 3-4 minutes or more on Cadel.
BYOP88 said:The next 2 stages could be interesting with the finishes, if Tommy V and Sanchez are still with the Schlecks, Basso then maybe with a downhill attack they could put the Schlecks and Basso under pressure, not sure how good Evans is at going downhill, compared to Sanchez but I know he's better than the other 3.
Bennyl said:If Andy needs a lesson in how to take responsibility and race like a champion, maybe he should take to Fabian, who never shirks a contest, takes responsibility, and when he attacks everyone takes notice, and his competition shudder.
You have to wonder what Fabian, Stuie and Jens think about the racing style of their leaders after killing themselves day in, day out to put them in the best position of any in the race come the big climbs...
boomcie said:The Schleck bashing is getting tiresome. What the hell is so incredibly horrible about these guys?
Yeah, I'm not a real supporter of them myself, but the constant mud-slinging is just starting to get friggin' ridiculous... Do some people just start surfing on this wave of "hate" or does everyone really despise them that much?
Libertine Seguros said:Evans is a pretty good downhiller, not the most consistent though. He's not a Sánchez, a Nibali or a Valverde, but he's much better than the Schlecks of this world.
The only time I can recall him being bad on a descent was the Mortirolo, when Arroyo made him look like a chump. But with that, an absolutely shattered Evans (who'd done his usual trick of going deep in the red to stay with the leaders and lost time comparatively rapidly after dropping off) still gained time on the front group, it's just that Arroyo was truly flying.
Libertine Seguros said:Evans is a pretty good downhiller, not the most consistent though. He's not a Sánchez, a Nibali or a Valverde, but he's much better than the Schlecks of this world.
The only time I can recall him being bad on a descent was the Mortirolo, when Arroyo made him look like a chump. But with that, an absolutely shattered Evans (who'd done his usual trick of going deep in the red to stay with the leaders and lost time comparatively rapidly after dropping off) still gained time on the front group, it's just that Arroyo was truly flying.
Libertine Seguros said:a genuine comment on their ability to produce some top descenders.
Libertine Seguros said:I don't recall. Wouldn't have been Mortirolo unless Arroyo was doing 80, and the pack stayed together descending Gavia. Maybe Monte Grappa?
It depends how much of a difference Samu wants to make or how sure he is of doing it alone - I remember he attacked to La Granja in 2009, but Valverde followed (Valverde's probably a better technical descender anyway) and they quickly gapped people, but as Samu couldn't gap Valverde he sat up and waited for the ITT.