man, Americans love making cringe t-shirts
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
man, Americans love making cringe t-shirts
Ironically Sepp wins by the same margin Lemond did over Fignon at the 89 Tour, but the circumstances could not be more different.
My knowledge of history is fine, but evidently not so good on current events. I simply forgot Vingegaard shipped those extra 9 secs after the Angrilu stage.Huh, I thought you prided yourself on the knowledge of history, and even I know about those famous 8 seconds from the 1989 Tour, though I don't actually remember it.
I do find it rather unlikely that Vingegaard will gain 9 seconds on Kuss over the course of today's stage.
My knowledge of history is fine, but evidently not so good on current events. I simply forgot Vingegaard shipped those extra 9 secs after the Angrilu stage.
Wait a minute now, I said you made me realize how old I am, not that I'm old!Some people would say that's a sign of old age; remembering things from years ago, but not what happened recently.
Hadn't Remco cracked, Kuss wouldn't have won the Vuelta.
I guess that’s the good thing about this day and age, your aunt doesn’t need balls to be considered your uncle anymore. Or so they say.Yeah and if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle
Just because you say he's a deserved winner doesn't negate the uncomfortable truth that this race was decided at the table in favor of the weakest. So either your aunt has balls or you are full of sh-it.Yeah and if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle
What ifs are a dime a dozen
Congratulations Sepp Kuss ...derserved winner
Just because you say he's a deserved winner doesn't negate the uncomfortable truth that this race was decided at the table in favor of the weakest. So either your aunt has balls or you are full of sh-it.
No, but letting somebody else ride in the front seat is, so that balances out.Making a charade of a GT is not what makes you popular in the world of cycling.
I suppose it's a shame the race isn't ending with an ITT.
Would have been a mathematical nightmare to calculate how fast Roglic and Vingegaard would be "allowed" to go, to not risking overtaking Kuss, so they'd probably just all have gone full.
Had there been a time trial on the final day, then I'm not sure they would have neutralised the racing.
Again though, it's more that they did neither, and flip-flopped that causes the problem.The whining about a team choosing to comfortably sweep a GT podium rather than have three of their four most important riders wage war against each other for a week is, and I mean this kindly, completely insane. No team in the peloton would make the “fun” choice in this situation.
Kuss was better than anyone not on his team. Bike riders quite frequently win races when they have teammates who are probably stronger than they are.
Of course not. Hence why you could argue it was a shame there isn't one.
It could have been a shame for Kuss, cause then he would not necessarily have been in red at this point.
Just because you say he's a deserved winner doesn't negate the uncomfortable truth that this race was decided at the table in favor of the weakest. So either your aunt has balls or you are full of sh-it.
I don’t care that Kuss won ahead of Vingo and Rog. Any one of them would have been bad. I do care that Jumbo swept the podium and won with their 3rd best rider. This level of dominance is not good for cycling.The whining about a team choosing to comfortably sweep a GT podium rather than have three of their four most important riders wage war against each other for a week is, and I mean this kindly, completely insane. No team in the peloton would make the “fun” choice in this situation.
Kuss was better than anyone not on his team. Bike riders quite frequently win races when they have teammates who are probably stronger than they are.
Yeah it's not like he got 15 minutes in a breakaway nobody chased before Roglic and Vingegaard started clubbing everyone down who dared attack Seppy.The whining about a team choosing to comfortably sweep a GT podium rather than have three of their four most important riders wage war against each other for a week is, and I mean this kindly, completely insane. No team in the peloton would make the “fun” choice in this situation.
Kuss was better than anyone not on his team. Bike riders quite frequently win races when they have teammates who are probably stronger than they are.
I can see where this is going: Roglic ages gracefully and retires, the love of his family pulls Vingo away from cycling and we’re left with Remco versus Kuss.Yeah it's not like he got 15 minutes in a breakaway nobody chased before Roglic and Vingegaard started clubbing everyone down who dared attack Seppy.
Also, while one might cringe at the praise for Sepp Kuss' character, I still find it more tolerable than *** behavior being celebrated as "at least he's entertaining/he just speaks his mind"
Roglic won't retire before hugging it out with Fred Wright, dislocating his shoulder in the processI can see where this is going: Roglic ages gracefully and retires, the love of his family pulls Vingo away from cycling and we’re left with Remco versus Kuss.
This is a fair point. I've always said my problem with Kuss was entirely rooted in him in races and not a reflection on him as a person, whereas my problem with Sagan was entirely rooted in him as a person and nothing to do with him as a racer.Also, while one might cringe at the praise for Sepp Kuss' character, I still find it more tolerable than *** behavior being celebrated as "at least he's entertaining/he just speaks his mind"