Big Doopie said:
Puhleeze. Natural progression from what? When he was seeing Ferrari basically as a neo pro. How do we know what his natural progression is?
There is only one reason to go to Ferrari. One only. Nibali made that decision early on. I just love the fact that he gets a completely free pass from everyone here when his record tells us he is a huge cheat. If mick rogers rode up Today's mtf without opening his mouth wearing the pink jersey, this place would implode. Mick Rogers is dirty. Went to Ferrari. Same as nibali. Y the double standard.
And the next person who makes some f@&ked up dumba$$ connection between me saying that nibali is as dirty as they come and some anti-Italian bias should get banned. I'm talking about nibali and nibali only. I'm not saying anything about anyone else. And if anyone had ever followed my history of posting and not react because what they want to believe i said they'd know where i stand. So seriously shut the f up with your stupid dumba$$ accusations.
The terrible thing of a nibali win is just like Armstrong it tells all the cyclists that they had better sign up with Ferrari. Because they all know nibali's connection. Just like they did Armstrong's.
Nibali refutes suggestions that he had anything to do with Ferarri. I'm not going to pretend like I know either way, just like you shouldn't pretend like you know what the truth is either. It could be true, and if it is I hope the truth comes out, but from what I see it looks like sour grapes.
I did look at your post history and you seemed happy and excited about Ryder's success in the early stages, and soon as he turned to crap you've turned to the clinic to voice your displeasure about Nibali. And only about Nibali. Harping back to old claims that he refuted and then sued about years ago, and then trying to substantiate said claims by attacking how open, or closed in this case that his mouth is.
Honestly you're looking pretty stupid here. Perhaps you don't have some type of nationalistic bias, but unless you have something to bring to the table other than "his mouth is closed, and he's always been doped so you can't tell that he is doped"? I think you should just stop.
So I guess unless you can show that his neon-pro days showed some spike around the time that he allegedly associated with the Dr. or if you can find out what Vino is slipping into his drinks at night then this is a little pointless because he looks to everyone without an agenda like someone who has always been talented and therefore doesn't seem any more or less likely to be doped than anyone else.