You only joined this discussion recently which obviously impedes your ability to analyze it. This is evident throughout the 2 waste of time minutes it took to read it. It also shows all the usual flaws demonstrated by people who havent lived through any real doping scandals (except the very small frank schleck one) But even taking into account inexperience, your inability to identify the themes and sides of the discussion, is not suggestive of an intelligent person. They seem beyond you. The clearly unfunny attempt at humour at the end only adds to this interpretation.
My analysis on you, btw, and maybe it's as full of **** as your post, but I'll give it a try anyway, is that since you only started watching cycling very recently (something you confessed to) you are trying to hide your inexperience and gaps in knowledge, by constantly arguing for the sake of arguing. Especially evident in the wild and often contradictory positions you take pro racing section.
And that's all right in pro racing section where its never that serious and usually just banter. But here in the vipers pit, people feel lied to, they feel like their heroes are being slandered, they feel like their sport is being hijacked. You come in here, unprepared and looking for a game, your gonna get your nose bloody.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram